JUDGMENT Vivek Kumar Birla, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today, is taken on record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 3.3.2015 in criminal case no. 215 of 2015, arising out of case crime no. 10 of 2015, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 IPC and 25 (A) Act, police station Jahangeerpur, District Bulandshahar pending before the court concerned. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants has argued that the compromise between the parties has already been filed as Annexure no.1 to the supplementary affidavit and as the matter has been compromised on 20.3.2015, therefore, the present case be finally decided. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has not disputed the facts as stated by the learned counsel for the applicants. He further contended that opposite party no.2 does not want to proceed with the present case against the applicants and the same may be allowed. 6. In view of the fact that Smt. Suman Devi-opposite party no. 2 and the applicants, who are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the opposite party no. 2, do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them and the matter is purely of personal nature and family dispute, which has been mutually settled between the parties in view of the compromise dated 20.3.2015, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 7. Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana), and 2008(9) JT 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby set aside. The present application is accordingly allowed.