JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri R.P.S. Chauhan for the complainant. 2. We do not find any merit in this petition for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. At this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that the bail application of the petitioner in Case Crime No. 98 of 2015, under Sections 304, 506 IPC, Police Station Kamasin, District Banda, be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Courts below. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. this petition is finally disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner appears and surrenders before the Courts below within two weeks from today and applies for bail, then his bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (322) (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offences.