Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 1550 (ALL)

Mobin Ansari v. State of U. P.

2015-06-16

VINOD KUMAR MISRA

body2015
JUDGMENT Vinod Kumar Misra, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that act of committing suicide after arrival of husband indicates that there was time gap between the incident of alteration and abusing and suicide. He further submits that applicant is student of M.Sc. (Math) IIIrd semester and whole family has falsely been implicated in the incident. The applicant is in jail since 26.04.2015. 3. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and from the version of first information report it is not clear that as to why the deceased waited for husband arrival. Deceased appears to be of hypersensitive nature, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. 4. Let the applicant Mobin Ansari involved in Case Crime No. 89 of 2015, under Sections 306, 323, 504 IPC, P.S. Phoolpur, District Varanasi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions; (i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.