JUDGMENT 1. There are two prayers in the writ petition. First, that respondents should be directed to make free and fare investigation in Case Crime No. 130 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 328, 326A, 307, 506, 376, 511 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Ramala, District Baghpat. 2. The report itself has been lodged on 28.04.2015 and this writ petition has been sworn on 23.6.2015, i.e., within two months and there is nothing on record to show that Police is not proceeding in the matter with due reasonable expeditiousness. Therefore, at this stage, we do not find that any such direction need be issued. 3. The second prayer is that respondents be directed by issuing a writ of mandamus to ensure arrest of accused persons in the aforesaid case crime number. 4. Despite repeated query, learned counsel for petitioner, could not show any provision under which petitioner has a statutory right to have any person arrested and the Police is under corresponding legal obligation to do so. The provisions contained in Code of Criminal Procedure in respect to arrest are enabling provision and it is the objective discretion of investigating officer to decide as to whether he has to arrest a person and, if so, when an in what manner. 5. In view of above, we find no merit in this writ petition. Dismissed.