Judgment Mansoor Ahmad Mir CMP (M) No. 761 of 2015 1. By the medium of this limitation petition, the appellants applicants have sought condonation of delay of 253 days, which has creptin in filing the present Letters Patent Appeal. 2. We have gone through the limitation petition read with the impugned judgment and are of the considered view that the appellants applicants have carved out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. The limitation petition is disposed of. LPA No. 184 of 2015 3. Appeal is taken on Board. 4. Issue notice. Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondents. 5. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 04.08.2014, made by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 3496 of 2009, titled as Roshan Lal & ors. versus State of H.P. & ors., whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners respondents herein came to be allowed and the writ respondents appellants were directed to release the due and admissible wages of the writ petitioners respondents herein (for short "the impugned judgment"). Heard. 7. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, argued that the writ petitioners are not in position and no appointment order was issued in their favour. 8. We have gone through the impugned judgment. It appears that the Deputy Commissioner was asked by the learned Single Judge to file an affidavit, the relevant portion of which has been reproduced in para 13 of the impugned judgment. 9. While going through para 13 of the impugned judgment, it is crystal clear that the Deputy Commissioner has admitted in the said affidavit that the writ petitioners were in position at the time when the Patwaris of the concerned Patwar Circles had joined, is suggestive of the fact that the writ petitioners were in position and the respondents have rightly been directed to release the wages to them. 10. Having said so, the impugned judgment is legal and speaking one, needs no interference. 11. In view of the above, the impugned judgment is upheld and the appeal is dismissed alongwith all pending applications.