Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 166 (MAD)

R. G. Murugan v. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dindigul

2015-01-12

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2015
JUDGMENT K. RAVICHANDRABAABU, J. 1. Mr. S. Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to disburse his monetary benefits and the arrears in the post of Head Constable for the period 01.11.2010 to 09.09.2012 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2013. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the first respondent has directed the second respondent twice to disburse such monetary benefits to the petitioner and the last of such direction was issued by the first respondent on 02.12.2013, the second respondent has not been disbursed the monetary benefits so far. Therefore, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to consider his request for disbursing for such monetary benefits. 5. From the perusal of the materials placed before this Court, it is seen that the first respondent has twice directed the second respondent to disburse the monetary benefits as sought for by the petitioner and in spite of the same, the second respondent has not yet disbursed the said benefits. It is not known as to why the second respondent is keeping quite in spite of a direction issued by the second respondent. 6. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the second respondent has to be suitably directed to disburse such benefits to the petitioner without any further delay if no other legal impediment for such disbursement. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.11.2013 and pass orders on the same in the light of the direction already issued by the first respondent in this matter. Such exercise shall be done by the second respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.