ORDER : 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F.A. No. 1499 of 2006, dated 23.02.2010, whereby and where under the High Court has partly allowed the Regular First Appeal filed by the appellants-herein. 2. The brief facts of the case are that a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act") on 21.12.1998 by the State of Haryana for acquisition of land for development and utilisation thereof as residential and commercial area in Sector 3, Fatehabad, Haryana. Thereafter, a final declaration was issued under Section 6 of the Act upon finalisation of proceedings. 3. The Land Acquisition Officer (for short, "the L.A.O.") assessed the market value of the land at Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre. 4. The appellants, not being satisfied with the compensation so awarded by the L.A.O., approached the L.A.O. and sought for a reference under Section 18 of the Act to the Civil Court for determination of the fair compensation payable to the appellants. Accordingly, the L.A.O. referred the case of the appellants to the Reference Court. 5. The Reference Court registered the reference and recorded the evidence of the parties. Upon consideration of the entire material on record, the Reference Court determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 312/- per square yard. 6. Being aggrieved by the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, the appellants preferred appeals before the High Court. 7. The High Court disposed of the appeals in the same terms as in the order passed in the case of Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana and Ors. (R.F.A. No. 69 of 2000), dated 22.09.2008. Two notifications were the subject matter of the said order, namely notification dated 21.07.1993 and 21.12.1998. For the land acquired by notification dated 21.12.1998, the High Court determined the market value at Rs. 432/- per square yard for land abutting National Highway No. 10 on either side up to 100 meters, Rs. 342/- per square yard for the land beyond 100 meters from the National Highway No. 10, Rs. 376/- per square yard for the land situated up to the depth of 100 meters from the Fatehabad-Bhuna Road, and Rs. 359/- for the land situated on the sector road connecting National Highway No. 10 with Fatehabad-Bhuna Road. 342/- per square yard for the land beyond 100 meters from the National Highway No. 10, Rs. 376/- per square yard for the land situated up to the depth of 100 meters from the Fatehabad-Bhuna Road, and Rs. 359/- for the land situated on the sector road connecting National Highway No. 10 with Fatehabad-Bhuna Road. The appeals filed by the appellants were disposed of in the same terms. 8. Aggrieved by the judgment and order so passed by the High Court, the appellants are before us in these appeals. 9. We have heard learned counsels appearing for the parties to the lis and have carefully perused the records of the cases and the impugned judgments and orders passed by the Courts below. 10. Learned counsel for the appellants/petitioners very fairly states that the issues raised in these appeals and in the Special Leave Petition are identical to the issues raised and considered by this Court in the case of Bhavani Dass (D) By Lrs. and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. State of Haryana and Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6755-6762 of 2013) and connected matters disposed of on 25.02.2015. 11. Following the observations made in the aforesaid decision, we dispose of the appeal and the Special Leave Petition in the same terms, observations, conditions and directions.