Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 168 (MAD)

K. Malayandi v. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Forest & Environment to Department, Chennai

2015-01-12

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2015
JUDGMENT K. RAVICHANDRABAABU, J. 1. Mr. K.P. Krishnadoss, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. P. Gunasekaran, learned Counsel takes notice for R4 and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to fix and disburse pension to the petitioner by counting half of the service rendered by the petitioner from 12.12.1983 to 06.08.2009 as plot watcher on a daily wage basis along with regular service rendered from 07.08.2009 till 31.01.2014 with all consequential benefits. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that half of the service rendered by him as plot watcher on daily wage basis has to be added with his regular service and it is his further case that similarly situated persons have got benefit of such counting after obtaining the orders from this Court. By claiming so, the petitioner has already made a representation to the fourth respondent on 14.11.2014. It is stated that the said representation is still pending and not yet disposed of so far. Therefore, this Court only directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2014 and pass orders in the light of the orders passed by this Court in respect of the similarly situated persons. The third respondent shall pass such orders, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.