JUDGMENT 1. (Oral) - This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiff is arising out of the judgment and decree dated 23.04.2008 by the learned Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur in Civil Appeal (Decree) No.64/1986 "LR's of Heera Lal v. Gopal & Anr." who dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 19.07.1984 passed by the learned Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Phalodi, District Jodhpur in Civil Original Suit No.55/1978 "LR's of Heera Lal v. Gopal" by which, the learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff-LR's of Heera Lal seeking declaration and recovery of possession in respect of the suit property situated at Dholabala, Phalodi City viz. a plot of land admeasuring 151 gaj x 151 gaj. 2. The present second appeal has been filed by the appellant-Dev Kishan, who is one of the legal representatives of Heera Lal, along with other legal representatives of late Heera Lal, before the learned two Courts below, against the concurrent rejection of their suit, as aforesaid. 3. After framing of the relevant issues arising out of the plaint and written statement and after recording of the evidence, the learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-LR's of Heera Lal on 19.07.1984. 3. After framing of the relevant issues arising out of the plaint and written statement and after recording of the evidence, the learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-LR's of Heera Lal on 19.07.1984. The relevant portion of the findings of the learned Trial Court is quoted below for ready reference:- bl rjg ls ge ns[krs gSa fd oknh ds xokgku us izfroknh }kjk cj.Mk oknh dh tehu uD'kk esa ekdZ D;w0,y0okbZ0,Dl0 esa cukuk crk;kA tcfd izfroknhx.k us cjkenk viuh Lo;a dh tehu esa gh cukuk crk;k gSA eq> ihBklhu vf/kdkjh }kjk fnukad 9-7-1984 dks nksuksa i{kdkjku o muds vf/koDrkx.k ds lkeus ekSds dk fujh{k.k fd;k o uke fd;k ftldh fjiksVZ i=koyh ds lkFk layXu gSA ekSds ij uki djus ls fooknxzLr cjkenk izfroknhx.k dh tehu esa gh gksuk ik;k x;kA rFkk oknh dh tehu ij fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dksbZ vfrdze.k gksuk ugha ik;k x;kA blfy;s izfroknh }kjk oknh dh tehu ij vfrdze.k dj rkehj cukuk ugha ik;k tkrk gSA rFkk uD'kk esa ekdZ cjkenk ,y D;w ,Dl okbZ dh tehu blh dkj.k ls oknh dh fefYd;r dh tehu gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk vr% ;s nksuksa okn in oknh ds fo:) o izfroknhx.k ds i{k esa r; fd;s tkrs gSaA vkns'k oknh dk okn e; [kpkZ [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fMdzh ipkZ rS;kj fd;k tkosA Sd/- ( lR;nso Vkd ) eqaflQ ,oa U;kf;d eftLV~sV izFke oxZ] QykSnh " 4. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree of rejection of suit aforesaid dated 19.07.1984, the plaintiff-LR's of Heera Lal filed the first appeal before the first appellate court of learned Additional District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur namely, Civil Appeal (Decree) No. 64/1986 "LR's of Heera Lal v. Gopal & Anr." which was also dismissed on 23.04.2008, while affirming the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.07.1984 of the learned Trial Court. The relevant portion of the findings of the learned First Appellate Court for affirming the judgment and decree of rejection of suit by the learned Trial Court is quoted herein below for ready reference:- " oknh }kjk izLrqr mDr lk{; ds lUnHkZ esa ;fn ekSds dh fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k tk, rks Lo;a oknh ih0MCY;w0&3&nsod'".k ds vuqlkj mUgksaus ykypUn ls iwjs IykV dh tehu dk uki djok;k Fkk rc mRrj if'pe dh rjQ ls ukiuk 'kq: fd;k Fkk vkSj mRrjh if'peh fdukjs ij cxhph cuh gqbZ gSA cxhph ds ckn iwjs IykV dh tehu esa ls dksbZ tehu ugha gSA nwljs 'kCnksa esa ;fn dgk tk, rks Lo;a oknh ds vuqlkj ;fn cxhph ls uki fd;k tk, rks lgh fLFkfr Li"V gksxhA vc ;fn bl lUnHkZ esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh }kjk fd;s x;s ekSdk fujh{k.k dh fjiksVZ dks ns[kk tk, rks ekSdk fujh{k.k dh fjiksVZ esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds rRdkyhu ihBklhu vf/kdkjh us Li"V fy[kk gS fd ekSds ij uki fuf'pr fcUnq cxsph ls 'kq: fd;k x;kA cxsph dh pkSM+kbZ if'pe ls iwoZ dh rjQ chl QqV gqbZA bl lUnHkZ esa ;gka ;g dguk mfpr gksxk fd Lo;a oknh us viuh lk{; esa dgk gS fd cxhph iwjs IykV dh tehu esa gh gSA mDr ekSdk fujh{k.k fjiksVZ esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh us vkxs fy[kk gS fd cxsph ds i'pkr if'pe ls iwoZ dh rjQ lkB QhV pkj bap vkSj mlds i'pkr fQj if'pe ls iwoZ dh rjQ lkB QqV pkj bap uki fd;k x;kA bl izdkj cxsph lfgr dqy ,d lkS pkyhl QqV vkB bap dh nwjh ij fu'kku fd;k tkdj ns[kk x;k rks fooknxzLr cjkenk tks fd mij uD'ks esa yky L;kgh ls fn[kk;k x;k gSA mDr cjkenk cxsph ds uki ds ckn nwljh ckj okys lkB QqV pkj bap uki ds Hkhrj gh vkrk gSA bl rjg ls fooknxzLr cjkenk izfroknh dh tehu ds uki esa gh vkrk gSA fooknxzLr cjkenk oknh ds tehu ds uki esa ugha tkrk gSA bl fjiksVZ dk ;fn/;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k tk, rks ;g Li"V gksxk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh us tks uki 'kq: fd;k gS] og cxsph ls 'kq: fd;k gSA Lo;a oknh ds mDr c;ku ds vuqlkj Hkh mlus tc ykypUn ls iwjs IykV dh tehu dk uki djok;k rc mRrj if'pe dh rjQ ls ukiuk 'kq: fd;k vkSj mRrjh if'peh fdukjs ij cxhph cuh gqbZ gSA oknh us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd if'peh rjQ cxhph ds ckn iwjs IykV dh tehu esa ls dksbZ tehu ugha gS vkSj cxhph iwjs IykV dh tehu esa gh gSA bl izdkj ;g fLFkfr Li"V gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh us lgh fcUnq ls uki 'kq: fd;k Fkk vkSj bl uki&tks[k ls ;g fLFkfr Li"V gqbZ fd izfroknh us dksbZ vfrdze.k oknh dh tehu esa ugha fd;k gS vkSj rFkkdfFkr cjkenk izfroknh dh tehu esa gh gSA bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izfroknh dk ;g rdZ iw.kZr% lkjghu gks tkrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ihBklhu vf/kdkjh us oknh dh tehu dk vkSj izfroknh dh tehu dk uki ugha fd;kA izfroknh dh tehu dk uki fd;k x;k gS] tks mijksDrkuqlkj Li"V gS vkSj ekSdk fujh{k.k fjiksVZ esa cus uD'ks ls Hkh ;g fLFkfr Li"V gks tkrh gSA tgka rd vihykFkhZ ds bl rdZ dk iz'u gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us bl fcUnq ij xkSj ugha fd;k fd oknh dh tehu de gS ;k ugha] gekjs fopkj esa bl fcUnq ij bl rjhds ls fopkj fd;k tkuk vko';d ugha gS] D;ksafd ns[kuk ;g gS fd oknxzLr cjkens okyh Hkwfe ij ;kfu ,y0D;w0,Dl0okbZ0 Hkwfe ij izfroknh us vfrdze.k fd;k gS ;k ugha\ bl rjg ls fopkj fd;k tkuk blfy;s vko';d gS D;ksafd ;g ns[kuk vfr vko';d gS fd ;fn bl fooknxzLr Hkwfe ls izfroknh dks csn[ky dj fn;k x;k rks blls dgha izfroknh dks mlds vf/kdkj dh Hkwfe ls rks csn[ky ugha fd;k tk;xkA tc izfroknh ls dCtk oknh dks fnyk;k tk jgk gks rks ;g ns[kuk t:jh gS fd izfroknh ds ikl mlds uki ls vf/kd Hkwfe gS ;k ugha vkSj tks Hkwfe mlds ikl gS og lgh yksds'ku ij gS ;k ugha] vU;Fkk fLFkfr izfroknh ds vf/kdkjksa dk guu gks tk;sxkA vihykFkhZ dk ;g rdZ Hkh lkjghu gS fd rFkkdfFkr fooknxzLr LFkku okyh Hkwfe fcfYMax ykbZu ls ckj gS ftlls mldk vfrdze.k lkfcr gksrk gSA gekjs fouez er esa izfroknh ds vfrdze.k dh tkap dsoy ek= bl vk/kkj ij ugha dh tk ldrh D;ksafd ;g vko';d ugha gS fd fcfYMax ykbZu okys nwljs Hkw&[k.M lgh yksds'ku esa gks] [kkl rkSj ls rc tcfd izfroknh viuh lgh yksds'ku esa vkSj lgh uki ij vofLFkr gSA bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fook|d la[;k 1 o 2 dk fu.kZ; oknh ds fo:) o izfroknhx.k ds i{k esa djus esa dksbZ fof/kd ;k rF;kRed =qfV ugha dh gSA " 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned judgments and decrees of the both Courts below, this Court is satisfied that no substantial question of law arises for consideration by this Court in the present second appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff-Dev Kishan S/o Heera Lal since deceased through LR's. In the circumstances of the case, the findings of facts about the plaintiff having failed to prove any encroachment of the defendants over his land in dispute and further failed to prove that the alleged Varrandah had been constructed by the defendants in the land of the plaintiffs, therefore, these findings cannot be said to be perverse in any manner and the said orders do not give rise to any substantial question of law in this second appeal and this second appeal of the appellants-plaintiffs-LR's of Heera Lal deserves to be dismissed being devoid of any merit. The findings of facts arrived by both the Courts below are correct and based on relevant and cogent evidence led by the parties before the Courts below. This Court finds no force in the present second appeal of the appellant-plaintiff-Dev Kishan S/o Heera Lal since deceased through LR's. 6. Accordingly, the present second appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff-Dev Kishan S/o Heera Lal since deceased through LR's is dismissed. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to both the Courts below and the parties concerned forthwith.Appeal dismissed. *******