JUDGMENT 1. - The appellant/plaintiff having lost the legal battle before the two courts below concurrently has filed the present second appeal assailing the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.12.2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge (FT) No.1, Hanumangarh, whereby the learned appellate court has dismissed the Civil Appeal No. 163/2007-Rameshwar @ Om Prakash v. Onkar Ram , and affirmed the judgment and order dated 18.01.2002 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Hanumangarh, dismissing the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for declaration, cancellation and permanent injunction. 2. The relevant findings of the learned trial court while dismissing the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff vide its judgment and decree dated 18.01.2002 reads as infra:- eSaus mHk; i{k }kjk vxzsf"kr rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA izLrqr izdj.k esa oknh ;g izekf.kr djus esa lQy ugha jgk gS fd iz'uxr Hkw[kaM mlds fy, dz; fd;k x;k Fkk iz'uxr foys[k esa mldk uke Fkk rFkk iz'uxr Hkwfe ij mldk dCtk Fkk o gSA bl dkj.k izfroknh fook|d la[;k 5 dks izekf.kr djus esa lQy jgk gSA oknh dk lu~ 1978 esa ckfyx gksuk Lo;afl) gSA mldh 3 lky dh fe;kn ds nkSjku og la'kks/ku dk okn izLrqr dj ldrk FkkA tks mlds }kjk 1990 esa izLrqr FkkA fd;k x;k gSA tks fd 9 lky foyEc ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA bl dkj.k oknh dk okn ckcr ifj'kks/ku fodz; foys[k fe;kn ckgj gSA bl izdkj izfroknh fook|d la[;k 6 dks izekf.kr djus esa lQy jgk gS izfroknh us viuh lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr ugha fd;k gS fd mls okn&i= izLrqr gksus ls fdl en esa fdruk&fdruk gtkZuk gqvk gSA bl dkj.k izfroknh fook|d la[;k 7 dks izekf.kr djus esa lQy ugha jgk gSA vr% fook|d la[;k 5] 6 izfroknh ds i{k esa rFkk fook|d la[;k 7 izfroknh ds fo:) fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA vuqrks"k pwafd oknh fook|d la[;k 1] 2] 3 o 4 dks izekf.kr djus esa vlQy jgk gS vkSj fook|d la[;k 5] 6 oknh ds fo:) r; fd, x, gSa bl dkj.k oknh fdlh izdkj dk vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh izrhr ugha gksrk gSA vkns'k vr% oknh jkes'ojyky dh vksj ls izLrqr okn fo:) izfroknh vksadkj ckcr ?kks"k.kk ,oa ifj'kks/ku rFkk LFkk;h O;kns'k fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA i{kdkjku viuk&viuk O;; ogu djsaxsA mijksDrkuqlkj fMdzh rS;kj dh tkosA Sd/- v'kksd dqekj Vkd flfoy U;k;k/kh'k dfu"B [kaM guqekux<+ ( jkt0 ) " 3. The relevant findings of the learned lower appellate court while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff vide its judgment dated 21.12.2011 are also quoted herein below for ready reference:- " vfHkys[k ij vkbZ lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ@oknh rF; izekf.kr djus esa vlQy jgk gS fd mldk uke jkes'oj ds lkFk vkseizdk'k uke jgk gks rFkk fodz; foys[k esa of.kZr uke vksadkj oknh dk uke jgk gksA lkekU; i'"B Hkwfe esa nks lxs HkkbZ;ksa dk ,d leku mPpj.k dk uke j[kus dh izFkk ugha ik;h tkrh gSA vr% ;g rF; fo'oluh; izrhr ugha gksrk gS fd izR;FkhZ@izfroknh vksadkjjke ds uke ds lkFk gh vihykFkhZ@oknh jkes'oj dk uke Hkh vkseizdk'k mQZ vksedkj jgk gksA oknh us vius vfHkopuksa esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd ?kj esa mldks vkseizdk'k ds uke ls cqyk;k tkrk Fkk] ijUrq bl lEcU/k esa mlus fdlh ?kj ifjokj ds fdlh lnL; dks lk{; esa izLrqr ugha fd;k gS rFkk nLrkosth lk{;] tks izLrqr gqbZ gS mlds vk/kkj ij Hkh oknh ;s izekf.kr djokus esa vlQy jgk gS fd oknh dk vU; uke vkseizdk'k jgk gks rFkk iz'uxr Hkwfe mlds firk us mlds uke ls dz; dh gks rFkk fyfidh; Hkwy ds dkj.k vkseizdk'k ds LFkku ij vksedkj 'kCn vafdr gks x;k gksA vihykFkhZ@oknh us vius okn&i= dh en la[;k 3 esa iz'uxr Hkwfe ij 'kq: ls gh oknh ds vkf/kiR; gksus ds vadu fd;k gS] tcfd en la[;k 6 esa viuk O;Ld gksus ij iz'uxr Hkwfe ij viuk ,dy vf/kdkj] vkf/kiR; o/kkj.k gksus dk ;.kZ; fd;k gS] tks fd nksuksa vfHkopuk fojks/kkHkk"kh gSA vihykFkhZ@oknh iz'uxr Hkwfe dks vius uke ls mlds firk }kjk dz; djuk o ml ij vihykFkhZ@oknh dk dCtk gksuk izekf.kr djus esa lQy ugha jgk gS rFkk bl rF; dks Hkh izekf.kr ugha dj ik;k gS fd mldk uke vkseizdk'k Hkh jgk gks] bl dkj.k oknh jktLo izdj.k la[;k 24@90 esa vko';d i{kdkj ugha FkkA tgka rd nqjfHklaf/k dk iz'u gS oknh us izfroknh la[;k 20 ij vk{ksi yxk;k gS] fdUrq oknh us okn&i= esa izfroknh la[;k 20 rglhynkj dks fMyhV djok fy;k gS] bl dkj.k oknh ;g izekf.kr djus esa lQy ugha jgk gS fd jktLo okn la[;k 24@90 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 9-3-1990 fof/k fo:) gSA bl lEcU/k esa vihykFkhZ@oknh }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d fofu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ls eSa lknj lger gwa] ijUrq rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k gLrxr izdj.k esa mijksDr U;kf;d fofu.kZ; vihykFkhZ@oknh dks dksbZ lgk;rk ugha djrs gSaA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk fook|d la[;k 1 ls 4 vihykFkhZ@oknh ds fo:) ,oa izR;FkhZ@izfroknh ds i{k esa fu.khZr fd;s x;s gSA tks iw.kZ :i ls U;k;laxr gS] ftlesa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha gSA vfHkys[k ij vkbZ lk{; ds vuqlkj vihykFkhZ@oknh ;g rF; izekf.kr ugha dj ik;k gS fd iz'uxr Hkwfe mlds firk us mlds uke dze dh gks rFkk fodz; foys[k esa of.kZr uke vksedkj vihykFkhZ@oknh dk uke ugk gks rFkk vihykFkhZ@oknh dh lk{; ds vuqlkj gh lu~ 1978 esa mldk iw.kZ O;Ld gksuk Hkh ,d Lohd'r rF; gS rFkk lu~ 1978 ls rhu lky dh fe;kn ds vanj og la'kks/ku gsrq okn izLrqr dj ldrk Fkk] ijUrq gLrxr okn fnukad 29-10-1990 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] tks fd yxHkx 9 o"kZ ds foyEc ls izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk mDr foyEc dk dksbZ U;k;laxr dkj.k ugha crk;k x;k gS rFkk vihykFkhZ@oknh }kjk fnukad 20-10-1990 dks izfroknh la[;k 17 ls 19 }kjk la'kks/ku ls badkj djus ds vk/kkj ij fe;kn gkfly gksuk crk;k gS] ;g rF; LokHkkfod izrhr ugha gksrk gS vihykFkhZ@oknh }kjk izdV fd;k tkuk izrhr gksrk gS D;ksafd bl rF; ds lEcU/k esa vihykFkhZ@oknh dh vksj ls dksbZ nLrkosth ;k ekSf[kd lk{; izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA vfHkys[k ij vkbZ lk{; ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fook|d la[;k 5 o 6 dks vihykFkhZ@oknh ds fo:) fu.khZr fd;k gS] tks iw.kZ :i ls U;k;laxr gS vkSj bl laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ@oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d fofu.kZ; rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k bl izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ@oknh dh dksbZ lgk;rk ugha djrs gSaA vkns'k vr% vihykFkhZ@oknh jkes'oj mQZ vkseizdk'k dh ;g vihy ,rn~}kjk fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkykSP; fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukad 18-1-2002 dh lEiqf"V dh tkrh gSA [kpkZ vihy i{kdkjku viuk&viuk ogu djsaxsA fu.kZ; ds vuqlkj ipkZ fMdzh cuk;k tkosA Sd/- lksguyky 'kekZ vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k ( QkLV V~sd ) la[;k&1] guqekux<+ ( jkt0 ) 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant, this Court is satisfied that no substantial question of law arises in the present second appeal as the appellant/plaintiff has miserably failed to prove that he was having alias name i.e. "Om Prakash" in addition to "Rameshwarlal" and that the suit property was purchased by his father for the appellant, and inadvertently, the name of the purchaser was mentioned as 'Onkar' instead of "Om Prakash". The plaintiff also failed to prove his possession over the suit land and during the limitation period he has not applied for correction of his name in the sale-deed, which was three years, whereas the suit was filed on 29.10.1990 i.e. after a delay of 9 years for which no legal or plausible reason was assigned. 5. Both the learned courts below have considered the relevant evidence minutely and the same calls for no interference by this Court in the present second appeal. Therefore, the present second appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff is found to be bereft of any force and the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties and the courts below forthwith.Appeal dismissed. *******