Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 1766 (HP)

Krishan Lal v. Golf Link Finance and Resorts Pvt. Ltd.

2015-12-02

P.S.RANA

body2015
ORDER : P.S. Rana, J. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties submitted that compromise has been executed inter-se the parties and permission to compound the case be granted and present revision petition be disposed of accordingly. Statements of revisionist and learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the non-revisionist recorded and placed on record. Court is satisfied that lawful compromise executed inter-se the parties hence permission to compound the case is granted in the ends of justice. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the revisionist submitted that compensation of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) already paid to the non-revisionist. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the non-revisionist submitted that compensation amount received. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of non-revisionist submitted that sentence of imprisonment imposed by learned trial Court and affirmed by appellate Court be set aside. In view of the above stated facts sentence of imprisonment imposed by learned trial Court and affirmed by appellate Court set aside. Judgment and sentence passed by learned trial Court and affirmed by learned first appellate Court are modified to this extent only. Statements of revisionist and learned Advocate appearing on behalf of non-revisionist shall form part and parcel of this order. Compounding fee will be deposited by revisionist before learned trial Court within fortnight. Record of learned trial Court be sent back forthwith along with certified copy of this order. Criminal Revision Petition No. 224 of 2014 is disposed of. Pending application if any also disposed of.