JUDGMENT : Muzaffar Hussain Attar, J. 1. Caveat discharged. The parties have locked horns in respect of the landed property before the Civil Court in four different Suits. During the pendency of Civil suits, the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam vide order dated 31st December, 2014 on the application of one of the respondents, constituted a team of officers for undertaking the demarcation of land situated at Sozieth Goripora Tehsil Narbal. In the order, besides directing the team constituted for undertaking demarcation, it is also stated that same shall be conducted in presence of all the stake holders and without disturbing the possession on spot. 2. This order was called in question by the appellant in OWP No. 36/2015, which has been dismissed by the learned writ court vide order dated 05th March, 2015. It is this order which is called in question in this Latters Patent Appeal (LPA). 3. Mr. Javed Iqbal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that prior to passing of the order for demarcation by the Deputy Commissioner, the demarcation of the same property was conducted, so second order of demarcation could not be issued by the Deputy Commissioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the learned writ court at paragraph 7 of the impugned order has recorded finding on the merit of the case in favour of the respondents. Learned counsel submitted that the filing of application for seeking demarcation is a game plan to dispossess the appellant from the property in question. 4. The order for demarcation of the property, which was subject matter of the writ petition, passed by the Deputy Commissioner on the face of it is innocuous. Section 94 of the Land Revenue Act permit for conducting the demarcation of the landed property. The Deputy Commissioner has passed the order, which was within his competence. The order of the Deputy Commissioner does not in any manner what so ever, prejudice any of the rights of the appellant, inasmuch as, it has been provided that the demarcation shall be conducted in presence of the all the stake holders which include the appellant as well and possession on spot has to remain un-disturbed. None of the legal rights of the appellant is infringed by issuance of demarcation order by the Deputy Commissioner. For valid reasons orders for demarcation of land can be passed from time to time. 5. None of the legal rights of the appellant is infringed by issuance of demarcation order by the Deputy Commissioner. For valid reasons orders for demarcation of land can be passed from time to time. 5. At paragraph 7 of the impugned order, the learned writ court has stated that the respondents 6 to 9 are seeking demarcation of their land. It is not the expression of opinion in favour of the respondents by learned writ court on the merits of the case. It is only claim of the respondents to which reference is made and which is also reflected in the order of the Deputy Commissioner. It does not prejudice the legal rights of the appellant. For our above stated reasons this appeal being merit-less is dismissed alongwith connected IA(s).