Judgment:- 1. The petitioner is challenging the list of Computer Teachers registered upto 31.10.2014 issued by the second respondent on the ground that it does not include her name. Consequently, she seeks for a direction to the second respondent to include her name in the said list and sponsor her to the first respondent for being considered by the third respondent for appointment to the post of Computer Instructor in Government Higher Secondary School in pursuance of his notification dated 13.10.2014. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is as follows:- She belonged to the Backward Class Community and registered her name with the second respondent on 24.03.2008. The third respondent issued notification to fill up the post of 175 Computer Instructors for the year 2009-2010. The name of the petitioner and others were sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Even though the petitioner was provisionally selected earlier, her name was deleted subsequently, due to inclusion of 74 additional candidates. Therefore, the petitioner approached this court and filed a writ petition in W.P(MD)No.16383 of 2012 and the same is pending. Thereafter, the third respondent once again issued with a fresh notification on 13.10.2014 for direct recruitment of 62 Computer Instructors. Though the list of eligible candidates was sponsored by the Employment Office, the petitioner's name was not included therein on the reason that the petitioner was already provisionally selected earlier and that she failed to renew the registration. The Government subsequently issued G.O.Ms.No.584, dated 08.12.2014 permitting renewal of employment registration by candidates, like the petitioner, whose registration has lapsed. Accordingly, the petitioner got her registration renewed on 12.12.2014 with retrospective effect from 23.04.2008. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation on 16.12.2014 seeking for inclusion of her name in the list. As the said representation has not been considered, the present writ petition is filed. 4. Though the writ petition was filed challenging the list of Computer Teachers registered with the second respondent, this Court is not inclined to go into the said issues and disturb the list, as the petitioner's only grievance is that her name is to be included in the said list, based on her renewal made on 12.12.2014 with retrospective effect from 23.04.2008. Therefore, it is for the second respondent to consider the said request of the petitioner, which was made through her representation dated 16.12.2014 and pass order on the same also by considering the renewal done with effect from 23.04.2008. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of only with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.12.2014 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law also by taking note of the renewal made in favour of the petitioner with effect from 23.04.2008. Such order shall be passed by the second respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.