Satay Prakesh Bhusan @ Satay Bhusan v. State of U. P.
2015-07-08
BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA, VIJAY LAKSHMI
body2015
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in Case Crime no. 202 of 2015, under sections 406, 504, 506 I.P.C, P.S. Civil Lines, district Meerut. 3. From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R, it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused. 4. However, considering the nature of the allegations made in the F.I.R., the provisions of section 157 Cr.P.C. and the view taken by the Apex Court in the case of Joginder Kumar Vs. State of U.P. 1994 Cr.L.J 1981, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in above mentioned case, till the credible evidence is not collected by the Investigating Officer during Investigation. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is finally disposed of.