JUDGMENT 1. (Oral) - The present first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant-Smt. Shanta W/o late Dr. Hemchand aggrieved by the rejection of her suit (Civil Original Suit No. 43/2005 : Smt. Shanta v. Kashiram & Anr.) by the Trial Court of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 3, Bikaner on 18.07.2009. The suit aforesaid was filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of possession and in the alternative for ejection of the defendants. 2. Hemchand aggrieved by the rejection of her suit (Civil Original Suit No. 43/2005 : Smt. Shanta v. Kashiram & Anr.) by the Trial Court of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 3, Bikaner on 18.07.2009. The suit aforesaid was filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of possession and in the alternative for ejection of the defendants. 2. The learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit on 18.07.2009, while recording the following findings:- " 10- bl lEcU/k esa nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA ih0MCY;w0 1 ds vf/koDrk Jh gjxksiky eksgrk us vkns'k 10] fu;e 1 lh0ih0lh0 ds rgr tc mudk ijh{k.k fd;k x;k rks mlesa mUgksaus vius okni= ds iSjk la[;k 2 esa bdjkj ds ckcr~ pqi jguk vafdr ckcr~ iz'u fd;k x;k ftlesa mUgksaus mRrj fn;k fd izfroknh la[;k 1 o 2 vkil esa lxs HkkbZ gSa vk;Unk tks bdjkj gqvk mldh ckcr~ izfroknhx.k HkkbZ gksus ls pqIi lk/k jgs gSa ;gha vk'k; bl iSjs ls gS vkSj blhfy;s fodYi esa fdjk;snkjh dh Iyh yh gqbZ gSA okfn;k us vius okni= dh en ea[;k esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd izfroknh la[;k 2 us tks izfroknh la[;k 1 dk lxk HkkbZ gS] dks fnukad 10-3-1999 dks nks&rhu ekg ds fy;s ifjlj ekaxh nh Fkh o twu&99 esa izfroknh la[;k 2 us okfnuh dh nqdku dh pkch ns nh ysfdu vkilh laca/k dh otg ls ;k fdUgha dkj.kksa ls okfnuh ds lkFk gq;s vius bdjkj ckcr~ pqi jgs rks Hkh okfnuh izfroknh la[;k 1 ls izfroknh la[;k 2 dk dCtk ifjfeflo its'ku lekIr gks tkus dh otg ls izfroknh la[;k 1 ls Hkh dCtk izkIr djus dh vf/kdkfj.kh gS rFkk ;fn izfroknh la[;k 2 vius vkidks fdjk;snkj dgs ;k fdjk;snkj gksuk ik;k tk;s rks Hkh mlds }kjk fodYi esa izfroknh la[;k 1 }kjk tk;nkn N% ekg dk e/;orhZ ykHk vnk u djus ls o izfroknh la[;k 2 }kjk izfroknh la[;k 1 dks nqdku dk ,DlDywtho dCtk nsus ls mDr fdjk;snkjh ds vk/kkj ij Hkh nqdku dk dCtk ikus dh gdnkj gSA okfnuh us viuh ftjg esa Li"V fd;k gS fd nqdku dk iV~Vk mlus is'k ugha fd;k gSA /kqM+kjke us fnukad 10-3-1999 dks nqdku ekax dj yh ;g rkjh[k mlds ikl ?kj ij j[kh gqbZ o fy[kh gqbZ gSa oks fy[kh gqbZ U;k;ky; esa is'k ugha dh rFkk ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k fd /kqM+kjke ds lkFk dksbZ fy[kki<+h ugha gqbZ vkSj Lo;a dFku fd;k fd mlds tku&ifgpku Fkh blfy;s nqdku ekaxus ij ns nh Fkh o ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k fd twu] 1999 esa nqdku [kkyh djds ns nh Fkh mldh dksbZ fy[kki<+h ugha dh Fkh o nqdku nsrs le; og [kkyh dj laHkkyrs le; /kqM+kjke o mlds vykok vU; dksbZ ugha Fkk o /kqM+kjke us mlds dksbZ jde Hkh vnk ugha dh bl lEcU/k esa okfn;k dk dFku gS fd mlus bl gsrq dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh o dk'khjke ds f[kykQ rkyk rksM+dj dCtk djus dh ,Q0vkbZ0vkj0 Hkh ntZ ugha djk;h rFkk bl rF; dks Hkh lgh crk;k fd bl eqdnes ds vykok mlus dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh o ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k fd dk'khjke us fookfnr nqdku esa guqeku nw/k HkaMkj ds uke ls nqdku dj j[kh gS o bl rF; dks lgh crk;k fd uksfVl izn'kZ ,&1 mldks dk'khjke dh vksj Hkstk x;k ftldh ,0Mh0 izn'kZ ,&2 ij , ls ch gLrk{kj gS o bl uksfVl dk dksbZ tokc mlus ugha fn;k FkkA ;gka ;g mYys[k djuk mfpr gS fd ;fn dk'khjke mldk fdjk;snkj ugha Fkk rks oks uksfVl dk tokc nsrh ysfdu 'kkark }kjk ,slk ugha fd;k x;k o ;g Hkh lgh crk;k fd /kwM+kjke lu~ 1999 ckn ls mls ugha feyk o ;g lgh crk;k fd bl nkok ds djus ls igys mUgksaus dksbZ uksfVl /kwM+kjke o dk'khjke dks ugha fn;k tcfd Mh0M0&1 dk'khjke us dFku fd;k fd mlus okfnuh ls nqdku fdjk;s ij yh gqbZ gSA :0 450@& izfrekg dh nj ls okfnuh dks ekg flrEcj] 1999 rd dk fdjk;k vnk gqvk gS rFkk mlds ckn dk ekg vxLr] 2000 rd dk fdjk;k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k d0[k0 chdkusj esa nQk 19] js.V d.V~ksy ,DV ds rgr tek djk;k gqvk gS o nqdku mlds ikl cgSfl;r fdjk;snkj dh gSfl;r ls gS o bl nqdku esa og nw/k dk O;kikj fnukad 10-03-1989 ls nqdku fdjk;s ij nsus ds le; ls fy;k gqvk gS o mlus ;g nqdku fnukad 10-03-1989 dks :0 300@& izfrekg dh nj ls fdjk;s ij yh tks fdjk;snkjh tqckuh 'krksZa ij fMyhojh vkWQ its'ku ds lkFk dk;e gqbZ FkhA okfnuh us ekpZ] 1996 esa fdjk;k c<+kdj :0 450@& dj fn;k Fkk o mlds i'pkr~ flrEcj] 1999 rd okfnuh us fdjk;k olwy fd;k vkSj mlds i'pkr~ c<+kdj :0 1]000@& izfrekg djus dks dgk ftls mlus eatwj ugha fd;k ftl ij okfn;k us mls nqdku [kkyh djus dks dgk o tcjnLrh nqdku [kkyh djkus dh /kedh nh rc mlus nkok uacjh fnokuh la[;k 191@01 is'k fd;k o fu"ks/kkKk gkfly dh o mlus ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k fd mlus ;g vDVwcj o uoEcj] 1999 dk fdjk;k tfj;s euhvkWMZj Hkstk tks okfn;k us ysus ls bUdkj dj fn;k Fkk fQj mlus okfn;k dks uksfVl nsdj mlds LFkkuh; cSad dk uke o [kkrk la[;k iwNh tks okfn;k dks feyk ftldk dksbZ tokc mlus ugha fn;k ftl ij vnkyr flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ( d0[k0 ) chdkusj esa fdjk;k tek djk;kA izfroknh us vius leFkZu esa laor~ 1991 o laor~ 2048 dh cgh izn'kZ ,&3 fnukad 11-6-1996 dh cgh izn'kZ ,&4] izn'kZ ,&5 fnukad 1-11-1989 dh cgh gS o izn'kZ ,&6 fnukad 1-7-1999 ls cgh gS tks mlds gkFk dh fy[kh gqbZ gS ftlesa nw/k dk fglkc gS ;s lHkh cfg;ka mlds gkFk dh fy[kh gqbZ gS tks izn'kZ ,&7 iksLV vkWfQl dh jlhn gS ftlesa euhvkMZj HkstkA izn'kZ ,&8 euhvkMZj okil vk;k mldh vly gS rFkk odhy ds ekQZr uksfVl fn;k og izn'kZ ,&1 gS ftl ij , ls ch gLrk{kj odhy ds gS tks mlds lkeus fd;s FksA ;gka ;g mYys[k djuk mfpr gS fd okfnuh us viuh ftjg esa uksfVl feyus ds rF; dks Lohdkj fd;k gS o fdjk;k tek djk;k mldh nj[okLr dh izekf.kr izfr izn'kZ ,&9 o mldh QnZ vgdke dh udy izn'kZ ,&10 gS rFkk /kkjk 19@1 dh nj[okLr ds uksfVl okfnuh dks Hkstk mldh ,0Mh0 izn'kZ ,&11 gS ftldh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn'kZ ,&11 , gSA mlus okfn;k ds f[kykQ eqdnek fd;k mlds QSlys izn'kZ ,&12 gS o fMdzh dh izekf.kr izfr izn'kZ ,&13 gS rFkk tks fdjk;k tek djk;k mlds pkyku is'k fd;s oks izn'kZ ,&14 ls izn'kZ ,&43 gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us Li"V fd;k gS fd nqdku ysus ds le; mldh 'kkark ls tku&igpku gqbZ Fkh o ckrphr nqdku ij gqbZ Fkh o ikl esa iM+kslh jkenso pDdh okyk Fkk rFkk jkenso ds lkeus fdjk;s dh ckr gqbZ Fkh og pDdh okyk vc /ka/kk cnydj nqdku NksM+dj pyk x;k gS o ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k fd rhljk eghuk 1989 ds fnu ckr gqbZ Fkh tks nhokyh ds djhc ikap eghus igys ckrphr gqbZ Fkh ftjg esa xokg us Li"V fd;k fd mlds ikl 'kkark dh dksbZ jlhn ugha gS o bl lq>ko dks xyr crk;k fd mlds HkkbZ /kqM+kjke us 'kkark ls nqdku ekax dj fdjk;s ij yh gks o Lo;a Li"V fd;k fd mldk HkkbZ xkao esa jgrk gS mUgksaus nqdku fdjk;s ij ugha yh FkhA xokg us bl lq>ko dks xyr crk;k fd vDVwcj] 1999 esa nqdku dk rkyk rksM+dj dCtk fd;k gksA 11- bl laca/k esa nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; ds voyksdu ls o nLrkostkr ds voyksdu ls o izn'kZ ,&3 ds voyksdu ls nqdku izfroknh la[;k 1 }kjk okfnuh ls fdjk;s ij fy;k tkuk lkfcr gksrk gSA ;gka ;g mYys[k djuk Hkh mfpr gS fd tks /kkjk 19&,] jktLFkku izsfelst ( daV~ksy vkWQ js.V ,.M bfoD'ku ) ,DV] 1950 dk izkFkZuk&i= izfroknh la[;k 2 }kjk flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ( d0[k0 ) la[;k 1 ds le{k is'k fd;k x;k Fkk mlesa Hkh okfn;k dks uksfVl fn;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k Fkk ftlesa Hkh okfn;k dh rkehy gqbZ Fkh ysfdu mlds i'pkr~ oks ogka Hkh mifLFkr ugha vk;h FkhA bl izdkj nksuksa i{kksa dh lk{; ls voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gks tkrk gS fd nqdku /kqM+kjke izfroknh la[;k 2 }kjk ekaxdj fnukad 10-3-1999 dks ugha yh Fkh o uk gh dCtk okfil ykSVkus rd :0 1]500@& e/;orhZ ykHk ds :i esa vnk djuk Lohdkj fd;k Fkk gkykafd /kqM+kjke mifLFkr ugha gqvk gS ysfdu ;g rF; okfn;k dks gh lkfcr djuk FkkA okfn;k dh lk{; ls rudh la[;k 1 lkfcr ugha gksrh gS rFkk rudh la[;k 2 Hkh lkfcr ugha gksrh gS D;ksafd okfn;k dk dFku fd izfroknh la[;k 1 us rkyk rksM+dj dCtk fd;k gS tcfd mlds }kjk bl lEcU/k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh x;h tcfd izfroknh dh lk{; ls ;g Li"V gS fd nqdku okfn;k ls mlus okfn;k ij yh Fkh tks lu~ 1989 esa yh FkhA vr% bl izdkj rudh la[;k 1 o 2 okfn;k ds fo:) o izfroknh ds i{k esa r; dh tkrh gSA " 3. The learned counsel Mr. Salil Trivedi on behalf of Mr. Sajjan Singh appearing for the appellant-plaintiff submitted that the defendant-respondent No. 1-Kashiram and the respondent-defendant No. 2-Dhuraram are the real brothers being the sons of Ladhuram. The suit shop in question was taken by the defendant No. 2-Dhuraram for few months and, therefore, in fact, the defendant No. 2-Dhuraram is the tenant of the plaintiff Smt. Shanta. It is also submitted that the possession of the suit shop was handed over to the landlady-Smt. Shanta and thereafter, the defendant No. 1-Kashiram forcibly entered into the shop (No.24) in question which is situated at Jai Narayan Vyas Nagar, Bikaner which was earlier taken by the plaintiff from the Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner on lease. The learned counsel also submitted that the rent of the suit shop deposited under Section 19(1) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control & Eviction) Act, 1950 by the defendant No. 2 has wrongly been construed by the learned Trial Court and, therefore, the learned Trial Court has erred in finding that there was the relationship of landlady-tenant qua the defendant No. 1- Kashiram and for this reason, the suit filed by the plaintiff-Smt. Shanta had been dismissed. 4. The learned counsel submitted that the other ground taken by the learned Trial Court for rejecting the suit of the plaintiff was that the suit filed by the defendant No. 1-Kashiram for injunction against the plaintiff-Smt. Shanta was decreed in the manner that she may not dispossess the defendant No. 1- Kashiram without taking the due process of law and the suit was decreed in favour of the defendant No. 1-Kashiram on the ground that the present plaintiff-Smt. Shanta agreed to take the due process of law for eviction which was undertaken by her in the form of filing of the present suit but even this present suit had been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. Hence, the present first appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-Smt. Shanta. 5. Neither anybody is present on behalf of the defendants-respondents despite service of the notices nor both the brothers, the defendants are present in the Court. 6. Hence, the present first appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-Smt. Shanta. 5. Neither anybody is present on behalf of the defendants-respondents despite service of the notices nor both the brothers, the defendants are present in the Court. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff Smt. Shanta and upon perusal of the record of the case, this Court is of the opinion that it appears that both the defendants-respondents are hands-in-glove and to defeat the due process of law undertaken by the plaintiff-appellant-Smt. Shanta, it appears that they have adopted this method. It is noticed that the present suit for possession filed by the plaintiff against the defendant No. 1-Kashiram was with the plaint averments that he was not the tenant of the plaintiff but was a trespasser in the suit shop and, therefore, apparently mere deposit of rent in the Court by the defendant No. 1-Kashiram under Section 19(1) of the Act of 1950 did not make him the tenant of the plaintiff-appellant-Smt. Shanta. It is also noticed that there was no rent receipt in favour of the defendant No. 1- Kashiram issued by the plaintiff-appellant-Smt. Shanta in this regard. 7. In view of the discussion made herein above, the present appeal deserves to be allowed and the suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant Smt. Shanta deserves to be tried on its own merits, as the learned Trial Court has erred in dismissing the suit by the impugned judgment dated 18.07.2009. 8. Accordingly and in view of the above, the present first appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff-Smt. Shanta W/o late Dr. Hemchand Saxena is allowed. The impugned judgment dated 18.07.2009 is set aside; and the trial of the suit is restored at the stage of arguments, since the evidence of both the parties is said to have been completed. In view of the fact that the present suit is of the year 1995, therefore, the learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial of the suit and conclude the same, preferably within a period of six months from today. The parties may appear in the first instance before the learned Trial Court on 17.11.2015. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court concerned and to the parties concerned forthwith.Appeal Allowed. *******