JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner-complainant assailed the impugned Order dated 20.8.2014, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No. 94/2012 (State v. Gurdayal Singh and Ors.) whereby learned Trial Court allowed the application of respondent-accused persons for summoning five defence witnesses mentioned in the application. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that proposed witness Ranveer Singh has already been examined as PW-15 before the learned Court below on 25.3.2014, therefore the witness, who has already been examined cannot be re-summoned at the stage of defence evidence, as he has already been cross-examined by the defence Counsel. He further submits that other witnesses are also not relevant witnesses, therefore, without considering these facts learned Trial Court committed error in allowing the application, so, the order impugned may be quashed and set aside. 3. Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondent-accused submits that in cross-case accused persons also sustained injuries and Circle Officer Chandresh Gupta Additional S.P. Yadram Fasal have investigated the matter and proposed witness Ranveer Singh is also investigated the matter. Investigating Officer Sukhvinder Singh and Chinder Singh are neighbours, who witnessed the incident. Therefore to prove the defence that who was aggressor in the matter, the proposed defence witnesses are relevant, as such learned Counsel for the respondent-accused supported the order impugned. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor supported the impugned order. 5. I have considered the submissions made by learned Counsel, since witness Ranveer Singh, Sub-Inspector has already been examined as PW-15 in the case during trial on 25.3.2014, therefore recalling of this witness in defence is not permissible in view of provisions of Section 233 Clause 3 of Cr.P.C. So far as other proposed witnesses are concerned, they were rightly ordered to summon as defence witnesses as two witnesses are police witnesses, who investigated the matter and two are neighbours, who are said to have witnessed the incident, therefore, this Revision Petition is partly allowed and the order passed in relation to summon Ranveer Singh Sub-Inspector is quashed and set aside and rest of the order in relation of summoning other four defence witnesses stands confirmed. However, respondent accused persons will be at liberty to apply for recalling of Ranveer Singh (PW-15) if so advised and law permits.With these observations, this Revision Petition is disposed of..Revision partly allowed. *******