JUDGMENT : MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, J. 1. By the medium of this writ petition, the writ petitioners have questioned the order dated 9.9.2011, (Annexure P-3), made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, for short the Tribunal, in Original Application No. 606/HP/10, titled Roshan Lal versus Union of India and Others, whereby the concerned examiner has been asked to re-look into the attempted Question No. 2(b), hereinafter referred to as the impugned order. The prayer of applicant Roshan Lal, writ respondent herein, to send the matter to another examiner, stands rejected. It is apt to record para-4 of the impugned order, herein:- “We would, accordingly, dispose of this O.A. with a direction to the competent authority to refer the matter to the concerned examined who may have a re-look at the attempted Question No. 2 (b). (The relevant question to be attempted and the answer attempted by the applicant appear at page 18 and 44 respectively of the OA). It will be the entire discretion of the examiner to examine the matter independently and take whatever view he wants in the contest of the grievance raised by the applicant. However, we negative the plea raised on behalf of the applicant that the matter should go to another examined. We also do not find merit in the contention that the Tribunal may, on its own, quantify the marks awardable for the attempted answer. 2. While going through the impugned order, we are of the considered view that the impugned order is legal and speaking one is not suffering from any infirmity and the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the impugned order is upheld and the writ petition is dismissed. 3. Interim order dated 24.1.2012 is vacated.