JUDGMENT 1. JUDGMENT 1. (Oral) - By the impugned order dated 17.10.2015, the learned trial court of the Additional District Judge No.1, Hanumangarh, in the present suit for cancellation of the sale deed purportedly executed by plaintiff-Ajmer Singh himself, rejected the temporary injunction application with the following observations:- " blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr n'"Vkar 'ks= iky cuke Jherh jsuw o vU;] ,0vkbZ0vkj0 2002 jktLFkku ist 159] okys ekeys esa izR;FkhZ ds gd esa iathd'r fodz;&i= 20 o"kZ iqjkuk fd;k gqvk FkkA bl izdkj iathc) fodz;&i=/kkjh ds fo:) LFkxu vkns'k tkjh djus ls badkj fd;k gSA blh izdkj vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vU; U;kf;d n'"Vkar lqrh{k.k dqekj flag cuke iq"i dqekj xxZ o vU;] ,0vkbZ0vkj0 2013 bykgkckn ist 142] esa of.kZr ekeys esa izfroknhx.k us tfj;s iathd'r fodz;&i= e'rd ds iq= o iqf=;ksa ls fookfnr tehu [kjhn dh FkhA bl izdkj izfroknhx.k ds fo:) vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk tkjh ugha fd;k tkuk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds }kjk oknxzLr Hkwfe ds laca/k esa fookfnr iathd'r fodz;&i= ds xokg lruke flag o dUgS;kyky rFkk vU; dzsrk y{eh nsoh /kudM+ ds gd esa djok, x, fodz; bdjkjukek rFkk fodz; bdjkjukek dh ikyuk esa izkIr fd, x, 25]50]000@& :i;s rFkk le; & le; ij rgjhjukek tkjh djokdj fodz;&i= iathc) djok, tkus dh vof/k dks c<+k, tkus ds rF;ksa dks izkFkhZ us iw.kZ :i ls fNik;k gSA bl rjg izFke n'"V~;k ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ U;k;ky; ds le{k LoPN gkFkksa ls ugha vk;k gS rFkk tgka izkFkhZ us iwoZ esa fodz; bdjkjukek rgjhj dj 25]50]000@& :i;s izkIr dj fy, Fks] ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dks :i;ksa dh vko';drk okLrs cSad dtZ pqdrk djus izFke n'"V~;k fo'oluh; izrhr ugha gksrh gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd mlus dUgS;kyky o lruke flag ls vius [kkuxh [kpZ ds fy, :i;ksa dh vko';drk gksus ij :i;ksa ds fy, dgk] tcfd izkFkhZ us igys ls gh dUgS;kyky o lruke flag ds gd esa oknxzLr Hkwfe dk fodz; bdjkjukek rgjhj o rdehy dj 25]50]000@& :i;s izkIr fd, gq, gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dk ;g rdZ fo'oluh; izrhr ugha gksrk gS fd mlus vius [kkuxh [kpZ ds fy, :i;ksa dh vko';drk gksus ij lruke flag o dUgS;kyky dks m/kkj :i;s fnyok, tkus dh ckr dgh gksA bl izdkj izFke n'"V~;k izkFkhZ }kjk viuh Hkwfe dk oknxzLr iathc) fodz;&i= ds xokgksa dks fodz; fd;k tkuk rFkk dzsrkx.k ds gd esa ;k muds }kjk uke funsZf'kr O;fDr ds gd esa fodz; i= iathc) djok;k tkuk izkFkhZ us tfj;s bdjkjukek fy[kdj fn;k gS rFkk mDr dzsrkx.k dh lk{kkr~ mifLFkfr esa oknxzLr fodz;&i= iathc) gksuk izrhr gksrk gSA bl rjg izFke n'"V~;k ;g izdV gksrk gS fd iwoZ of.kZr fodz; bdjkjukek ds dzsrkx.k ds dgs vuqlkj gLrxr fodz;&i= iathc) gqvk gS rFkk izkFkhZ us mDr lHkh rF;ksa dks fNik;k gSA vizkFkhZ ds gd esa iathc) fodz;&i= rLnhd fd;k gqvk gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izFke n'"V~;k izkFkhZ dk ekeyk ugha curk gSA mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ lnHkkoh izrhr ugha gksrk gS] u gh LoPN gkFkksa ls U;k;ky; ds le{k vk;k gqvk izrhr gksrk gS rFkk egRoiw.kZ rF;ksa dks izkFkhZ us fNik;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ us vius }kjk iwoZ esa fd, x, fodz; bdjkjukesa ij dksbZ vk{ksi ugha mBk;k gS mDr fodz; bdjkjukesa esa of.kZr dzsrkx.k dh ekStwnxh esa gLrxr fodz;&i= iathc) djok;k gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izkFkhZ izFke n'"V~;k viuk ekeyk izekf.kr djus esa vlQy jgk gSA vr% izFke n'"V~;k ekeyk dk fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fo:) o vizkFkhZ ds gd esa fuf.kZr fd;k tkrk gSA lqfo/kk dk larqyu ,oa viw.khZ; {kfr& mDr nksuksa fcanqvksa ds laca/k esa bl U;k;ky; dh fouez jk; esa tgka izkFkhZ izFke n'"V~;k viuk ekeyk izekf.kr djus esa vlQy jgk gS rFkk izkFkhZ us iwoZ esa fd, x, fodz; bdjkjukes dks fNik;k gS rFkk LoPN gkFkksa ls U;k;ky; ds le{k vkuk izrhr ugha gksrk gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa lqfo/kk dk larqyu o viw.khZ; {kfr ds fcUnq Hkh izkFkhZ ds fo:) fuf.kZr fd, tkrs gSaA izFke n'"V~;k ekeyk] lqfo/kk dk larqyu ,oa viw.khZ; {kfr ds rhuksa fcUnq izkFkhZ@oknh ds fo:) fuf.kZr fd, x, gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ@oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= ckcr~ vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk vLohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA vkns'k vr% izkFkhZ@oknh vtesj flag dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= ckcr~ vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk varxZr vkns'k 39 fu;e 1 o 2 lh0ih0lh0 fo:) vizkFkhZ@izfroknh ujsUnz flag ,rn~}kjk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA Sd/- jkes'oj izlkn pkS/kjh vijk ftyk U;k;k/kh'k la0 1] guqekux<+ ( jktLFkku ) 2. Mr. Ramniwas Choudhary, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant submitted that the sale deed was executed by misleading the plaintiff, whereas he believed the said document to be a document of mortgage and the defendant-Narendra Singh himself was of the same village, to which the plaintiff belongs and under such misconception, the sale deed was executed, cancellation of which was sought in the present suit. The suit property in question is an agricultural land in chak No.2 B.R.P.Patthar No.12/355, Murabba No.47, Kila No.11/2, 20, 21, measuring 0.595 hectares, totalling 1.265 hectares was purportedly sold for Rs. 25,50,000/-. The learned trial court has rejected the temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff, not believing the plaint averments and the arguments raised in the first instance. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff-appellant, this Court is satisfied that the impugned order does not call for any interference. A big amount of Rs. 25,50,000/- is said to have been paid to the plaintiff-vendor for transfer of the agricultural land and if the plaintiff wants to resile from such an agreement and execution of the sale deed, heavy burden lies upon him to prove that these registered documents have been executed under a mistake of fact or any other factors influencing the validity of such document/transaction. 4. Though it is needless to say that any suit property, if transferred during the course of trial, remains subject to the same as per Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, and nothing beyond this could have been directed in the present case, at the stage of temporary injunction. Since the learned court below has not found even a prima facie in favour of the plaintiff-appellant, this Court is of the considered opinion that the temporary injunction has rightly been rejected by the learned court below, and the same does not require any interference by this Court in the present case. 5. This misc.appeal of the plaintiff-appellant is found to be devoid of any merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, this misc.appeal of the plaintiff is dismissed. No costs. Copy of this order may be sent to the concerned parties as well as the learned court below forthwith.Appeal dismissed. *******