JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner has preferred this misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.RC. for quashing the FIR No. 613/2015 for the offence u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC registered at Police Station Kotwali, Dausa. 2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent no. JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner has preferred this misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.RC. for quashing the FIR No. 613/2015 for the offence u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC registered at Police Station Kotwali, Dausa. 2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent no. 2 Jagdish Prasad Poshwal submitted a complaint before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dausa against the petitioner and one Shri Ramavatar Gurjar statinq as under:- " U;k;ky; eq[; U;kf;d eftLV~zsV nkSlk txnh'k izlkn iks"koky iq= Jh izgykn tkfr xqtZj fuoklh ljZ iqfyl Fkkuk ukaxy jktkorku ftyk nkSlk ifjoknh cuke 1- Jherh vuks[khnoh iq=h Jh ukjk;.k iwoZ iRuh txnh'k izlkn gky iRuh jkeorkj xqtZj fuoklh :ikMh jsoklh rglhy uknksrh ftyk djkSyh gky fuoklh ikuh dh Vadh ds ikl lkseukFk uxj] nkSlk] 2- jkeorkj xqtZj v/;kikd [kqnZ cSjkMk rglhy fldjk; ftyk nkSlk vfHk;qDr@ifjokn vUrxZr /kkjk 190 lhvkjihlh vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 209 ,oa 120&ch Hkk0na0la0 egksn; ifjokn i= fuEu is'k gS& ;g fd ifjoknh o eqyfte uEcj 1 dks fookg rkjh[k 16-05-2003 dks :ikMh jsoklk esa gqvk FkkA ifjoknh us mlds vR;kpkjksa ls ihfM+r gksdj ftyk U;k;ky; nkSlk ls fnukad 01-07-2008 dks fookg foPNsn dh fMdzh izkIr dj yh FkhA mlds ckn Hkh vuks[kh nsoh ifjoknh o mlds ifjokjtu dks ijs'kku djus ds fy, >wBs eqdnes ntZ djkrh jghA ;g gS fd blds i'pkr~ vfHk;qDr la[;k 1 us vfHk;qDr la[;k 2 ls ukrk izFkk ls fookg dj fy;k] tcfd og iwoZ esa fookfgr gSA vuks[kh nsoh us jkeorkj ds lEcU/kksa ls ,d yM+dk Hkh iSnk gks pqdk gS tks djhc lok Ms<+ o"kZ dk gS ftls ysdj og nkSlk esa jg jgh gSA ;g gS fd mDr lHkh ckrksa ds gksrs gq, Hkh vuks[kh nsoh us izkFkhZ ls /kks[kk/kM+h o tkylkthiwoZd jde ,saBus dh xtZ ls feF;k Hkj.k iks"k.k izkIr djus ds fy, izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 125 lhvkjihlh is'k dj fn;k tks xzke U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS ftlesa fnukad 13-08-2015 dks vUrfje xqtkjk HkRrk nsus ds vkns'k ikfjr Qjek fn;sA ;g gS fd eqyfte ds bl d'R; ls pUnz flag xqtZj o X;kjlhyky vkfn Hkh 'kkfey gSa ftUgksaus vkijkf/kd "kM;a= o Ny esa Hkkx fy;k gSA ;g gS fd izkFkhZ us bl lEcU/k esa fjiksVZ ntZ djokus ds fy, ,l0,p0vks0 nkSlk ds ;gka izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k rFkk ,l0ih0 lkgc nkSlk dks Hkh fyf[kr esa fuosnu fd;k] fdUrq mUgksaus dksbZ fjiksVZ ntZ ugha dh vkSj u gh dksbZ dk;Zokgh dhA jftLVMZ ,0Mh0 dh jlhn ifjokn ds lkFk layXu gSA blfy, ifjokn is'k djuk vko';d gqvk gSA ;g gS fd vfHk;qDr la[;k 1 us vfHk;qDr la[;k 2 ds lkFk o vU;ksa ds lkFk vkijkf/kd "kM;a= o tkylkth dj izkFkhZ ls :i;s ,saBus ds fy, feF;k Hkj.k iks"k.k dk nkok is'k fd;k gS tks mDr /kkjkvksa esa n.Muh; vijk/k gSA vr% ifjokn i= e; 'kiFk i= is'k dj fuosnu gS fd iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh nkSlk dks ifjokn /kkjk 156 ( 3 ) tkIrk QkStnknh esa Hkstdj eqdnek ntZ djus ds vkns'k Qjekos o vuks[kh nsoh jkeorkj o muds yM+ds dks Mh,u, tkap djokdj izkFkhZ ifjoknh dks U;k; fnykus o nksf"k;ksa ds f[kykQ l[r dkuwuh dk;Zokgh dj nf.Mr djus dh d'ik djsaA " 3. Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, while exercising power vested u/s 156(3) Cr.RC. sent the said complaint to SHO, PS Kotwali, Dausa for investigation on which FIR No. 613/2015 for the offence u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC was registered and investigation commenced. The matter is under investigation. 4. Investigating Officer, Mr. Dileep Singh, SI, PS Kotwali, District Dausa is present in person along with case diary. He has submitted factual report in the matter, which is taken on record. 5. Mr. Umesh Vyas, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the same allegations respondent no. 2 complainant previously lodged FIR No. 76/2014 for the offences u/s 420, 467, 166, 167, 193, 197, 209, 468 and 120B IPC, which was registered at Police Station Nangal Rajawtan, District Dausa in which after investigation negative final report was submitted by concerned SHO before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Dausa wherein respondent no. 2 complainant submitted protest petition and after hearing on protest petition and considering the facts of negative final report, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dausa dismissed the protest petition and accepted the negative final report. Now, on the same allegations petitioner lodged another FIR No.613/2015 at Police Station Kotwali, Dausa which is not maintainable. 6. Mr. PC. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-complainant submits that petitioner is living with one Smt. Ramavatar Gurjar and having one issue from her and presently she is again pregnant from the petitioner, therefore, present FIR has rightly been lodged, therefore, this misc. petition may be dismissed. 7. Mr. N.S. Dhakad, learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that Investigating Officer has not considered the facts of the previous FIR No. 76/2014 registered at Police Station Nangal Rajawtan, Dausa. 8. After perusal of allegations levelled in FIR No. 76/2014 at Police Station Nangal Rajawtan and present FIR, it was stated that the same are almost similar, therefore, he fairly stated that second FIR is not maintainable. 9. Heard. 10. Since, the allegations levelled in the FIR No. 613/2015 registered at RS. Kotwali, District Dausa, u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC had already been alleged by the petitioner in FIR No. 76/2014 registered at P.S. Nangal Rajawtan u/s 420, 467, 166, 167, 193, 197, 209, 468 and 120B IPC in which after investigation police submitted negative final report against which respondent no. Kotwali, District Dausa, u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC had already been alleged by the petitioner in FIR No. 76/2014 registered at P.S. Nangal Rajawtan u/s 420, 467, 166, 167, 193, 197, 209, 468 and 120B IPC in which after investigation police submitted negative final report against which respondent no. 2 complainant filed protest petition which also resulted in dismissal and the negative final report was accepted by the concerned court, therefore, allegations levelled in the FIR have attained finality. Now on the same allegations, it cannot be permitted to re-open the matter in subsequent FIR as such the subsequent FIR No. 613/2015 for the offence u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC registered at RS. Kotwali, Dausa (Annexure-1) is not maintainable and the same is liable to be quashed.In view of the above, this misc. petition is allowed and the impugned FIR No. 613/2015 registered at P.S. Kotwali, District Dausa, u/s 420, 209 and 120B IPC is hereby quashed. 11. However, respondent-complainant will have liberty to raise his objection in defence during the proceedings pending u/s 125 Cr.RC. before the learned Family Court, Dausa. *******