JUDGMENT Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, J.: (Oral) - This revision petition is directed against order dated 10.09.2015 (Annexure P-5) vide which application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC for rejection of plaint on account of deficient court fee has been rejected. 2. Plaintiff has filed suit for declaration to the effect that plaintiff is exclusive owner in possession of 36 Kanals 15 Marlas of land out of total 42 Kanals. In alternative, suit for joint possession has been claimed besides making prayer for consequential relief seeking restraint order against the defendants in respect of dispossession of the plaintiff and alienation of the suit property. 3. At the stage of application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, only averments made in the plaint are to be seen. Apparently the plaintiff is non-executant of the sale deed, and possession has not been claimed as a substantive relief. In a suit for declaration filed by the non-executant of the sale deed for annulment of the same without seeking possession thereof, only fixed court fee is required to be affixed on the plaint. 4. Since the plaintiff is not the executant of the sale deed, nor possession has been claimed as a substantive relief, therefore, in considered opinion of this Court, no ad-valorem court fee is required to be affixed. Only a fixed amount of court fee payable on the plaint is required to be affixed in view of observations made in Tarsem Singh and others vs. Vinod Kumar and others, 2014(1) ICC 1054 and Mohinder Singh vs. Jai Pal and another, 2009(5) RCR (Civil) 771. 5. In view of above, no interference is called for and this revision petition is accordingly dismissed.