Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 20 (ALL)

Nanhu Pal @ Umesh v. State of U. P

2015-01-07

VISHNU CHANDRA GUPTA

body2015
JUDGMENT Vishnu Chandra Gupta, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. By means of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing the charge sheet and proceedings of Case No. 2072 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No. 312 of 2014, under Sections 307, 147, 148, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Gangaghat, District- Unnao pending before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao. 3. It has been contended that no case under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out as there is no injury said to have been caused in this case. 4. From the perusal of material on record, it could not be said that no case is made out against the petitioner. Therefore, at this stage no interference is called for by this Court. The petition lacks merit. 5. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below within three weeks from today and move bail application, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law and also keeping in view the directions contained in the judgment delivered by the Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) (Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.). 6. For three weeks or till the date of surrender, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. With this observation, the petition is finally disposed of.