Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 210 (MAD)

S. Muniyandi v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Madurai

2015-01-13

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2015
JUDGMENT K. RAVICHANDRABAABU, J. 1. Mr. A.P. Muthupandi, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay the Scale of pay and other allowances with effect from 2009 for the promotion post till the date of retirement on 31.10.2012 and consequently to settle pension and other retirement benefits such as Gratuity and leave salary together with interest at the rate of 12% for the delayed payment. 4. It is seen that the petitioner has already made a representation on 26.12.2014, seeking for the very same relief. It is stated that the said representation is still pending. 5. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits and the contentions raised in the writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2014 and pass orders on the same and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.