JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner-accused has preferred this misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. and prayed for fair and impartial investigation in this matter by other agency like CID (CB). 2. JUDGMENT 1. - Petitioner-accused has preferred this misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. and prayed for fair and impartial investigation in this matter by other agency like CID (CB). 2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No. 4 Brij Mohan has submitted a written report to SHO, PS Lalsoth, District Dausa which reads as under:- " vkt fnukad 26-6-2013 dks lqcg 10-30 cts ds djhc izkFkhZ o izkFkhZ dk HkkbZ fxjkZt] ppsjs HkkbZ Hkjryky] ujsUnz dqekj viuh [kkrsnkjh dh Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 1627 jdck 5 ch?kk 1 fcLok fLFkr xaxkiqj jksM+ ykylksV esa vius 2@3 fgLls esa cus jgoklh Vhu 'kSM esa cSBs FksA rFkk izkFkhZ o lHkh HkkbZ cSBdj [kkuk [kk jgs FksA ml le; ujsUnz lCth eaMh ls vk;k Fkk rHkh vpkud nsoukjk;.k dh t; cksyrs gq, i'Fohjkt xqtZj] dey xqtZj] jkegsr xqtZj] jktw xqtZj] fcjtw xqtZj] jes'k xqtZj] isekjke xqtZj] lwjt mQZ /kkU/kq ehuk] jkethyky ehuk] Hkjryky ehuk vkSj buds lkFk yxHkx 200&250 vU; yksx V~ksyh o V~sDVj esa cSBdj] 20&25 eksVjlkbZfdy ij lokj gksdj] thi] cksysjks] LdkfiZ;ks esa Hkjdj ,djk; gksdj "kM;a=iwoZd fxjksg cukdj vius gkFkksa esa ykfB;ka] dqYgkM+h ysdj izkFkhZ dh [kkrsnkjh Hkwfe esa ?kql x;sA lHkh us ,djk; gksdj izkFkhZ o mlds HkkbZ;ksa ij tkuysok geyk cksy fn;k] i'Fohjkt xqtZj us izkFkhZ ds flj o gkFk esa ykBh dh pksV ns ekjhA ftlls izkFkhZ dk gFksyh ds ikl ls gkFk VwV x;kA i'Fohjkt xqtZj us dgk j?kqjkt xqtZj vkt c'teksgu o fxjkZt dks [kRe djuk gh gSA Hkjryky ekyh ds flj esa jkegsr xqtZj us dqYgkM+h dh o lwjt mQZ /kka/kw us ykBh dh pksV ekjhA dey xqtZj us fxjkZt ds gkFk esa ykBh ekjh o lwjt eh.kk mQZ /kka/kw o jkethyky o Hkjryky eh.kk vkfn us ,djk; gksdj izkFkhZ;k ds lkFk ekjihV dh vkSj izkFkhZ dh Qly dks V~sDVj pyk dj [kqnZ&cqnZ dj fn;k vkSj izkFkhZ dk lkeku fVu 'ksM] nks yksgs ds ikbZi 20 QhV gSa] ydM+h dh cfYy;ka] V~sDVj ds gy o yksgs dh pkaVh] vks<+us] fcNksus ds fcLrj chl dqflZ;ka] nks yky o dkys cSx ftlesa dqN iSls o lCth eaMh dh dkxtkr o tehu ds dkxtkr Fks] QkoMh] xsars] nks pkjikbZ] ,d ipkl fdyks dk daVhys rkj dk caMy] [kkus ds crZu] ckYVh] mudh V~ksyh esa Hkjdj ys x;s vkSj izkFkhZ dk V~sDVj V~ksyh Hkh ys x;sA izkFkhZ dk eksckbZy o lksus dh pSu Hkh xys ls ywV dj ys x,A izkFkhZ dh eksVjlkbZfdy dks V~sDVj ls dqpy fn;kA izkFkhZ dks yk[kksa dk uqdlku igqapk;kA ekSds ij igqap dj rstjke ekyh] cuokjhyky] izHkqyky] t;jke ekyh us chp cpko dj izkFkhZ dks ljdkjh vLirky esa bykt djus ds fy, ysdj vk;sA vc izkFkhZ eqdnek ntZ djokus vk;k gS vr% Jhekuth ls fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDrx.kksa ds fo:) eqdnek ntZ dj izkFkhZ izkFkhZ dk lkeku tCr djus ckcr~ dk;Zokgh djsa] muds fo:) dkuwuh dk;Zokgh djus dh d'ik djsaA " 3. On the above said report, FIR No. 267/2013 u/s 143, 341, 323, 447, 452, 379 and 427 IPC was registered and investigation commenced. The matter is still under investigation. 4. Mr. Babu Lal, ASI, PS Lalsot, District Dausa is present in person and submitted factual report of the matter through Mr. NS Dhakad, learned Public Prosecutor which is taken on record. As per factual report offence u/s 143, 323, 325, 427 and 447 IPC is made out against the present petitioner along with co-accused Prithviraj Gurjar, Kamal Gurjar, Ramhet Gurjar, Raju Gurjar, Birju Gurjar, Ramesh Gurjar, Suraj @ Dhandu Meena, Bharat Lal, Raghuraj Gurjar for which charge-sheet No. 143/2014 has already been registered. Since, accused persons have failed to submit their bail bonds, therefore, charge sheet could not be filed in the court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that previously two investigating officers investigated this matter but they did not find involvement of present petitioner in the alleged offences. Now, the present investigating officer without any additional material wants to file charge sheet against the present petitioner, therefore, investigation may be transferred to CID (CB) for fair and impartial investigation. 6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that previous investigating officer also found involvement of present petitioner and the investigation was transferred on the complaint of accused persons. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is any doubt in fair and impartial investigation. He submits that this misc. petition may be dismissed. 7. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. 8. Since, after investigation investigating officer reached on the conclusion that aforesaid offences are made out against the present petitioner along with other co-accused and charge sheet has already been registered, therefore, no question of transferring the investigation arises. Therefore, this misc. petition being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed.Petition dismissed. *******