JUDGMENT Om Prakash-VII, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the record. 2. The applicant has filed this application under Section 482 the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1109 of 2015, State Vs. Pradeep Goswami and others, Case No. 17 of 2005, under Sections 147, 341, 336, 353 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kotwali, District Mathura, Further prayer has been made that the proceedings going on in the aforesaid case be stayed. 3. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence is made out. Investigating Officer submitted the charge sheet after investigation on the basis of insufficient evidence. The concerned court took cognizance without appreciating the evidence and applying judicial mind. 4. Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it cannot be said at this stage that no prima facie case is made out against the applicant. Hence prayer for quashing the proceedings of case crime mentioned above is hereby refused. 5. However, if the applicants surrender and apply for bail, the same may be considered in accordance with law laid down in the case of Amarawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC). The application is disposed of.