JUDGMENT Manoj Misra, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the orders dated 26.07.2014 and 20.06.2015 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba and also to quash the entire consequential proceeding of complaint case no. 08 of 2014 (Panna Lal Vs. Arun Kumar and others), under Sections 354, 452, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Khanna, District Mahoba. 3. A perusal of the record goes to show that earlier an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed by the applicants for quashing of the complaint proceedings, which was dismissed with liberty to the applicants to file an application seeking discharge under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. 4. The applicants applied for discharge, which was rejected by the Court below. 5. From perusal of the record it can not be said that the complaint allegations do not make out a prima-facie case to proceed against the applicants. More so when they have been supported by the statement recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. The complaint allegations are supported by the statement of the victim Smt. Bhullan. 6. In view of the above, I do not find any good reason to quash the impugned orders and the complaint proceeding. The application is, accordingly, dismissed.