JUDGMENT 1. - This Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 15.01.2015, whereby the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar imposed a condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- while suspending the sentence of the petitioner on an application preferred under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the Special Judge (N.I. Act Cases) No. 1, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No. 1213/2009 has convicted the petitioner for commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced him for one year's simple imprisonment and further directed to pay a compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 357 Cr.P.C. vide judgment dated 18.12.2014. 3. Being aggrieved with the judgment dated 18.12.2014, the petitioner has preferred an statutory appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. before the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar. Along with aforesaid appeal, an application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. was also preferred for suspension of sentence awarded by the learned trial court. The Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar has allowed the application for suspension of sentence with a condition to deposite Rs. 2,00,000/- vide order dated 15.01.2015. The petitioner has challenged the imposition of condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- by way of this Criminal Misc. Petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while exercising the powers under Sub-Section (1) of Section 389 Criminal Procedure Code.the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar has no jurisdiction to impose the condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- and as such the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar upto that extent is illegal and liable to be quashed. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court passed in case of Bhagwati Sahay Katriya v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Reported in 2010 (1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 684. and submitted that this Court has categorically held in above mentioned case that no such condition can be imposed by the appellate court while exercising powers under Sub- Section (1) of Section 389 Cr.P.C. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, therefore, prayed that the condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- as imposed in the order dated 15.01.2015 may be deleted. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, therefore, prayed that the condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- as imposed in the order dated 15.01.2015 may be deleted. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No. 1-State as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 2-complainant are unable to dispute the said position of law. 8. This Court in Bhagwati Sahay Katriya's case (supra) while taking into consideration the earlier judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as of this Court has laid down that no such condition of depositing an amount can be imposed by a Court while exercising powers under Sub-Section (1) of Section 389 Cr.P.C. 9. In view of above, this Criminal Misc. Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the condition of depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- mentioned in the order dated 15.01.2015 is ordered to be deleted. The impugned order dated 15.01.2015 is modified accordingly. *******