JUDGMENT Rajesh Dayal Khare, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri A.K.Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 12 of 2014 under Sections 498A, 323 I.P.C., and Section 3 /4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana Nawabganj, District Farrukhabad pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, District Farrukhabad as well as to quash the order dated 15.05.2013 issued in the aforesaid case. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no.1 and the opposite party no.2-wife have entered into compromise and t hey are living together as husband and wife and that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending. 4. Supplementary affidavit has been filed pursuant to the earlier order dated 01.12.2014 in which the compromise affidavit dated 06.12.2014 is annexed as Annexure-1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 09.12.2014. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2states that the matter has been compromised and that the opposite party no.2 do not want to proceed further. 6. In view of the fact that the husband and wife do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them and as the matter is purely of personal nature and family dispute, which has been mutually settled between the parties, in view of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 7. Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana) as well as the Judgment of the Apex Court reported in J.T., 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby set aside. 8. The present application is accordingly allowed.