Judgment 1. Mr. S. Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.08.2014 based on G.O.Ms.No.137, Co-operative Department dated 17.07.2008. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he is entitled to be considered for the post of Assistant under 50% quota as contemplated under the above said G.O., his claim was not considered and therefore, he made a representation on 13.08.2014, which is yet to be disposed of. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has made a representation seeking for the benefit of appointment to the post of Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.137 of 2008 dated 17.07.2008, it is for the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders if the above said G.O is applicable to the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court, is not expressing any view on the merits and the contentions raised by the petitioner, as it is for the second respondent to consider the same and pass orders as stated supra. Accordingly, the second respondent shall pass such orders on the same and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.