Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 256 (MP)

Radheshyam Mahaver v. M. P. Khadi Gramoudyog

2015-03-02

RAJENDRA MENON

body2015
JUDGMENT: Petitioner was working in the MP Khadi Tatha Gramodyog Board. Vide Annexure P/1, passed on 21.3.2006, he was superannuated on attaining the age of 58 years. Interalia contending that by an order passed on 13.1.1999, the age of superannuation of employees working in the Board has been enhanced from 58 to 60 years, this writ petition was filed seeking a direction to permit the petitioner to work upto the age of 60 years. 2. On notices being issued, respondents have filed reply and point out that the earlier circular dated 13.1.1999 – Annexure P/2 passed by the Board enhancing the age of superannuation has been quashed and set aside by the Governor vide Annexure R/1 dated 31.3.2000. 3. Accordingly it is stated that now in view of this order – Annexure R/1, petitioner cannot claim benefit of the Circular dated 13.1.1999, enhancing the age of superannuation. 4. On considering the aforesaid averments and on going through the order-dated 31.3.2000, passed by the Governor of the State, it is clear that finding the order-dated 13.1.1999 enhancing the age of superannuation to be void, it has been quashed. In view of the above, no indulgence is called for. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.