JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. 2. The contention is that the F.I.R. is founded on the strength of an allegation made by the Revenue Minister on unknown complaints. Learned counsel submits that there was absolutely no material for investigation yet an F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner. Learned counsel therefore submits that in the absence of any such cogent material, the F.I.R. deserves to be quashed. 3. Having considered the submissions raised, the limited issue that we can examine is as to whether on the allegations made any offence is made out or not capable of the investigation. In such limited scope, we do not find this to be a case where the F.I.R. can be quashed on such ground. 4. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to apply for bail before the court of competent jurisdiction and we hope that the court concerned shall consider it in accordance with law and dispose it of accordingly. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.