Judgment :- 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and consequently directing the second respondent to investigate into the representation of the petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in many cases and in most of the cases, he has already been acquitted. Further, the cases were foisted against him due to the personal vengeance by the respondent police officials. 3. Though it is to consider the representation of the petitioner, realizing the importance of this matter, the Superintendent of Police himself has filed a detailed counter affidavit, wherein, he has listed out atleast 17 cases, in which, six cases ended acquittal and the remaining cases admittedly are pending against the petitioner till date. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The apprehension of the petitioner cannot be entertained in this Writ Petition for the simple reason that the Superintendent of Police, being the Head of the Police Department himself has filed a counter affidavit and definitely, he would have taken into consideration various aspects. Therefore, admittedly, the prayer of the petitioner is seized by the Superintendent of Police concerned. If there is really any genuine grievance, he would act in accordance with law. Needless to say that once the petitioner is acquitted from the cases against him or according to the petitioner, if there is any malicious prosecution, it is always open to him to act in accordance with law against the erring officials, if he is advised to do so. However, at this stage, the request of the petitioner cannot be entertained. With the above observation, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.