JUDGMENT Manoj Kumar Gupta, J. By the impugned order dated 12 August 2015, the Waqf Tribunal has permitted the plaintiff respondent to withdraw the suit filed before it, with liberty to file proceedings before a competent Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the past, a civil suit was filed by the plaintiff respondent being Original Suit No. 1155 of 2009, the plaint whereof was rejected by order dated 1 May 2013, holding that the civil suit is barred under section 85 of the Waqf Act, 1995. It is urged that under the garb of the impugned order, the plaintiff respondent will now be in a position to maintain the suit before the Civil Court. 3. This Court is unable to accept the contention made in this regard by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The impugned order merely permits the plaintiff respondent to withdraw the proceedings pending before the Tribunal with liberty reserved in his favour to seek remedy before the competent Court. Such an observation does not mean that the Tribunal had adjudicated upon the question relating to maintainability of fresh proceedings before any Court of law. In case, any civil suit is filed by the plaintiff respondent, it is always open to the petitioners to contend therein that the same is not maintainable in view of previous adjudication dated 1 May 2013 in Original Suit No. 1155 of 2009. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order nor any prejudice having been caused to the petitioners to warrant interference in exercise of supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution. 5. The petition lacks merit and is dismissed.