JUDGMENT : Vineet Kothari, J. The present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the appellant defendant in a suit for eviction against the judgment and decree dated 24.05.1995 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mount Abu, Camp-Abu Road in Civil Appeal Decree No. 05 of 1992 (37 of 1987) "LRs of Bhur Mal v. LRs of Madan Lal" by which, the learned First Appellant Court has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 25.07.1987 passed by the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Abu Road in Civil Original Suit No.122/1984 "Madan Lal S/o Rameshwar Lal v. Bhur Mal S/o Poonam Chand" by which, the learned Trial Court had decreed the suit of the plaintiff-Madan Lal on the ground of default in payment of rent and directed eviction of the tenant-defendant-Bhur Mal. 2. 2. The relevant portion of the findings of the learned Trial Court in the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.07.1987 is quoted herein below for ready reference:- rudh la[;k 2 nks& nkSjkus nkok ekud fdjk;k ds ekeys esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us fookfnr ifjlj dk fdjk;k 47@& :0 izfrekg r; dj fn;k gS vr% fnukad 1-5-80 ls oknh 47@& :0 izfrekg fdjk;k ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS fdUrq nkok fnukad 1-9-84 dks is'k gqvk gSA vr% rkjh[k nkok rd 36 ekg dk fdjk;k ek= ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS tks :i;s 1792 gksrs gSaA rFkk fnukad 1-9-84 ls fookfnr ifjlj ls izfroknh dks csn[ky fd;s tkus rd oknh 47@& :0 izfrekg fdjk;k gtkZuk ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA oknh us 1260@& cdk;k fdjk;k ij dksVZ Qhl Hkjh gS vr% og cdk;k 532@& :0 fdjk;k ij ns; dksVZ Qhl vUnj ;kse 15 esa is'k djs vU;Fkk mls rkjh[k nkok rd dsoy 1260@& gh olwyh fMdzh nh tkuh pkfg;sA rudh la[;k 3 rhu& izfroknh us jkes'ojyky dUgS;kyky dk la;qDr fgUnw ifjokj dk edku gksuk dgk fdUrq fdjk;k jkes'ojyky dks gh nsuk dgkA mlus dksbZ lcwr is'k ugha fd;s fd oknh dks nkok ykus dk vf/kdkjh u gks rFkk lEifRr la;qDr ifjokj dh gks iwoZ esa Hkh eqdnek la[;k 82@77 enuyky us gh is'k fd;k Fkk rc Hkh mlus ;g vfHkopu ugha fd;sA vr% ;g rudh izfroknh ds fo:) r; dh tkrh gSA bl rjg mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij oknh dk nkok fo:) izfroknh fuEu izdkj e; [kpkZ fMdzh fd;k tkrk gS%& 1- izfroknh fookfnr nqdku ftldk o.kZu nkos ds in la[;k nks esa of.kZr gS nks ekg ds vUnj [kkyh dj dCtk lkSisaxsA 2- izfroknh oknh dks rkjh[k nkok fnukad 1-9-84 ls nqdku dk dCtk nsus rd dk gtkZ fdjk;k 47@& :0 izfrekg vnk djsxkA 3- izfroknh oknh dks rkjh[k nkok rd dk cdk;k fdjk;k 36 ekg dk izfrekg 47@& :0 dh nj ls 1792@& :0 vnk djsxk rFkk oknh 532@& :0 cdk;k fdjk;k dh dksVZ Qhl vUnj 15 fnu esa U;k;ky; esa is'k djsxk vU;Fkk og dsoy 1260@& olwy djus dk vf/kdkjh gksxkA 4- izfroknh us oknh ds gd esa tks fdjk;k fookfnr ifjlj ds lEcU/k esa vU; ekeys esa tek djok;k gS og oknh ikus dk vf/kdkjh gksxk rFkk ml gn rd izfroknh dqy cdk;k ls eqtjk ikus dk vf/kdkjh gksxkA 5- izfroknh oknh dks okn [kpkZ Hkh vnk djsxkA ,l Mh ¼'kf'kdqekj ikjhd½ eqaflQ ,oa U;kf;d eftLV~sV izFke oxZ] vkcw jksM+ ¼fljksgh½ 3. The relevant portion of the findings of the learned First Appellate court in the impugned judgment and decree dated 24.05.1995 is also quoted herein below for ready reference:- 11- fcUnq la[;k%2 ¼nks½ pwafd oknh us fdjk;k cdk;k gksuk dgk gS] tc fd izfroknh us dksbZ fdjk;k cdk;k gksuk ugha crk dj og fdjk;k fofHkUu rkjh[kksa esa fofHkUu eqdneksa esa tek djk nsus dk vfHkopu fd;k gSA vr% bl fo'ks"k vfHkopu dks izekf.kr djus dk Hkkj Hkh izfroknh ij gh vk tkrk gSA 12- ;g okn fnukad 01-09-84 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa oknh us ;g vfHkdFkr fd;k gS fd 01-05-80 ls fnukad 31-08-84 rd dk fdjk;k cdk;k gSA izfroknh us dksbZ fdjk;k ckdh ugha gksuk dgk gS ,oe~ U;k;ky; esa Vs.MlZ izn'kZ ,0&1 ls ,0&13 ds tfj;s tek djk nsuk vafdr fd;k gSA bl fof/kd fLFkfr esa Hkh dksbZ fookn ugha gS fd fdlh Hkh N%g ekg dk fdjk;k le; ij tek ugha gksus ls mls fof/kd O;fDrdzeh ekuk tkosxkA izn'kZ ,0&1 Vs.Mj }kjk ebZ o twu] 80 dk fdjk;k fnukad 06-06-80 tks tek djk;k x;k gS vkSj esjs er esa bu eghuksa dk fdjk;k vnk;xh esa dksbZ O;fDrdze ugha gqvk gSA izn'kZ ,0&2 Vs.Mj }kjk vxLr] 80 ls tuojh] 81 rd dk fdjk;k 20-2-81 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj bu lHkh Ng eghuksa dk fdjk;k izfroknh }kjk le; ij tek ugha djk;k x;k gSA blh izdkj izn'kZ ,0&3 }kjk Qjojh] 81 ls vxLr] 81 rd dk fdjk;k 31-10-81 dks tek djk;k x;k gS vkSj bu eghuksa dk ;g fdjk;k Hkh fuf'pr :i ls le; ds vanj tek ugha djk;k x;k gSA izn'kZ ,0&4 }kjk flracj] 81 ls fnlacj] 81 dk fdjk;k 7-01-82 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj ls dsoy fnlacj] 81 dk fdjk;k le; ij tek djk;k x;k gS] 'ks"k nks eghuksa dk ughaA izn'kZ ,0&5 }kjk tuojh] 82 ls twu] 82 rd dk fdjk;k 07-05-82 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj blds }kjk dsoy vizSy] ebZ o twu 82 dk fdjk;k gh le; ij tek gksuk ekuk tk,xkA 'ks"k tuojh ls ekpZ] 82 rd dk fdjk;k le; ij tek djkuk ugha ekuk tk ldrkA izn'kZ ,0&6 }kjk tqykbZ] 82 ls fnlacj] 82 rd dk fdjk;k 03-12-82 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj blesa ls Hkh dsoy uoEcj o fnlacj 82 dk fdjk;k gh le; ij tek gqvk gS] 'ks"k eghuksa dk ughaA izn'kZ ,0&7 }kjk tuojh] 83 ls twu] 83 rd dk fdjk;k 27-01-83 dks tek djk;k x;k gS] tks bu lHkh eghuksa dk le; ij tek djk;k tkuk ik;k tkrk gSA izn'kZ ,0&8 }kjk tqykbZ] 83 ls flracj] 83 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 30-9-83 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj blesa ls dsoy flracj 83 dk fdjk;k gh le; ij tek gqvk] 'ks"k dk ughaA izn'kZ ,0 12 }kjk vDVwcj o uoEcj] 83 dk fdjk;k 03-12-83 dks tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj ls Hkh vDVwcj] 83 dk fdjk;k le; ij tek ugha djk;k x;kA blds vfrfjDr izn'kZ ,0&13 }kjk fnlacj] 83 dk fdjk;k 22-12-83 dks] izn'kZ ,0&9 }kjk tuojh] 84 dk fdjk;k 05-02-84 dks] izn'kZ ,0&11 }kjk ekpZ] 84 ls fnlacj] 84 rd dk fdjk;k 30-03-84 dks le; ij tek djk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj izn'kZ ,0&1 ls ,0&13 }kjk ekud fdjk;s ds nkos esa ,oa /kkjk 19 ^^, o /kkjk 19 lh0lh0 ds fofHkUu eqdneksa esa tek djk;k x;k gSA 13- mDr foospu ds vuqlkj izfroknh us vxLr] 80 ls uoEcj] 81] tuojh] 82 ls ekpZ] 82] tqykbZ] 82 ls vDVwcj] 82 tqykbZ] vxLr 83 o vDVwcj] 83 bl izdkj dqy 36 eghuksa dk fdjk;k vkxkeh ekg dh 15 rkjh[k ls iwoZ u rks Hkqxrku fd;k vkSj u gh fufonku fd;k rFkk bl izdkj le; ij vnk ugha dj mDr eghuksa ds fdjk;k & vnk;xh esa O;frdze fd;k gSA 14- blds vfrfjDr tqykbZ] 80 dk fdjk;k rks fcYdqy gh vnk gksuk ugha ik;k tkrk gSA izfroknh us mRrj&okn esa ;g vfHkopu fy;k gS fd izn'kZ ,0&1 tks vxLr] 80 ls tuojh] 81 rd dk fdjk;k tek djkuk vafdr fd;k gS] okLro esa og tqykbZ] 80 ls fnlacj] 82 rd dk Fkk vkSj eghuksa ds uke fy[kus esa ;g xyrh gq;h] tks izn'kZ ,0&13 rd tkjh jghA ysfdu izfroknh ,slk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;k gS vkSj u gh ,slk ekuk Hkh tk ldrk gSA D;ksafd ;fn okLro esa bl izdkj eghus fy[kus esa xyrh gq;h gksrh] ftldk vadu izfroknh us vius mRrj&okn fnukad% 20-2-85 esa fd;k gS] rks fuf'pr&:i&ls blds ckn tek djk, x, Vs.MlZ esa ;g Hkwy lq/kkj dj yh x;h gksrh vkSj blds vfrfjDr iwoZ ds eqdneksa esa bl Hkwy dks lq/kkj djus dh dk;Zokgh dh x;h gksrh] ysfdu ,slk dqN Hkh ugha fd;k x;k gSA vr% tqykbZ] 80 dk fdjk;k rks vnk gksuk gh izekf.kr ugha gSA 15- bl izdkj mDr foospu ds vuqlkj izfroknh us 26 (sic! 36) ekg dk fdjk;k rks le; ij tek ugha djk;kA izfroknh dh vksj ls ,sls Hkh izek.k ,oe~ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh x;h gS fd mDr 26 ekg dk fdjk;k mlus le; ij /kukns'k }kjk Hkst dj bldk fof/kor fufonku dj fn;k vFkok vU;Fkk ifjnku fd;kA tqykbZ] 80 dk fdjk;k rks vnk gh ugha fd;k x;k vkSj bl izdkj fuf'pr&:i&ls izfroknh us Ng ekg ls vf/kd dk fdjk;k le; ij tek ugha djk dj fof/kd O;frdze fdjk;k & vnk;xh esa fd;k gS vkSj pwafd izfroknh us iwoZ esa Hkh Ng ekg ls vf/kd dk fdjk;k le; ij tek ugha djk;k Fkk] ftl gsrq izn'kZ&1 fu.kZ; esa izFke O;frdzeh Hkh ekuk x;k gSA vr% mDr 27 ekg ds fdjk;k & vnk;xh esa ;g O;frdze izfroknh dk f}rh; O;frdze gS vkSj ,slk gh fu"d"kZ fo}ku eaqflQ us fudkyk gS] ftlesa fdlh Hkh izdkj dk gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ,oe~ xqatkb'k ugha gS vkSj ml fu"d"kZ dks fdlh Hkh n`f"V ls voS/kkfud ,oe~ =qfViw.kZ ugha ekuk tk ldrkA 16- mijksDr fcUnqvksa ds fu"d"kZ ds izdk'k esa oknh dk okn fdjk;k & vnk;xh esa f}rh; O;frdzeh ds vk/kkj ij fdjk;k olwyh o fu"dklu ds fy, fMdzh fd, tkus ;ksX; Fkk vkSj ,slk gh dj fo}ku eaqflQ us esjs er esa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ,oe~ =qfV ugha dh gS vkSj mlds bl fu"d"kZ esa fdlh Hkh izdkj ls gLr{ksi djus dksbZ vk/kkj ,oe~ vkSfpR; ugha gS vkSj laiq"V fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA vkns'k 17- ifj.kker% fo}ku eaqflQ] vkcwjksM+ ds fu.kZ; ,oe~ fMdzh fnukad% 25-7-87 dks laiq"V djrs gq, vihykFkhZ&izfroknh dh ;g vihy lO;; fujLr dh tkrh gSA ,lMh vkfjQ eksgEen enkuh flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ofj"B [k.M vkcw ioZr] dSai&vkcwjksM+ ¼jktLFkku½ ^^ 4. While admitting the present second appeal on 05.07.1995, a coordinate Bench of this Court has framed the following substantial question of law for consideration by this Court:- "1. Whether the courts below erred in law in interpreting the Section 13(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 ? 2. Whether the courts below had no jurisdiction to pass decrees despite the fact that the rent has already been deposited in the courts below filing of the suit by the landlord ? 3. Whether the courts below had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the alleged default which was committed three years before the filing of the suit ?" 5. The learned counsel, Mr. Hemant Ballani & Mr. 3. Whether the courts below had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the alleged default which was committed three years before the filing of the suit ?" 5. The learned counsel, Mr. Hemant Ballani & Mr. V.D. Vaishnav on behalf of Mr. Vikas Balia, appearing for the appellant-defendant-tenant submitted that since in the rent notes in question (Ex. A.1 to A.13) by which the rent has been deposited by the tenant under Section 19-A of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 and in the challan for the aforesaid months, initially the rent note was for the months of July, 1980 to December, 1980 but inadvertendly, the same has wrongly been mentioned as "August, 1980 to January, 1981" and this mistake, of mentioning wrong months, has been repeated upto Exhibit-1 and, therefore, the findings of the learned Courts below regarding default in payment of rent giving the eviction decree are not sustainable. The learned counsel prayed for setting aside of the impugned judgments and decrees passed by the learned two Courts concurrently against the defendant-tenant. 6. On the other hand, the learned counsel, Mr. Arvind Samdariya, appearing for the plaintiffs-landlord-respondents urged that the continuous default of the defendant in making the payment of rent over a period of six months for various occasions has been found fatal to the interests of the defendant. However, this was the second default committed by the defendant, as the defendant was given the benefit of first default under Section 13(1)(a) of the Act of 1950 in the earlier suit and, therefore, the present second appeal filed on behalf of the appellant-defendant does not involve any substantial question of law and the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and upon perusal of the record of the case, this Court is satisfied that the present second appeal filed on behalf of the appellant-defendant-tenant against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the both the Courts below is liable to be dismissed, as the findings are based on relevant and cogent evidence led by the parties before the Courts below. This is Court is of the opinion that the eviction decree granted in the present case by the Courts below on the ground of continuous default in making the payment of rent by the defendant, has rightly been granted as per the settled legal position in this regard and, therefore, this appeal of the defendant is liable to be dismissed while answering the substantial questions of law in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. 8. Accordingly and in view of the above, the present second appeal filed on behalf of the appellants-LRs of Amrit Lal stands dismissed and the substantial questions of law, framed and quoted herein above, are answered against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiffs. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to the Courts below and to the parties concerned forthwith. 9. In the circumstances of the case, it is directed that the appellant-defendant-tenant shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit shop to the respondents-plaintiffs on or before 31.12.2016 and shall pay mesne profit @ Rs.1,000/- per month (Rupees One Thousand only) commencing from the month of December, 2015 and will further continue to pay the mesne profit each month by 15th day of the next succeeding month or in advance to the respondents/plaintiffs also and in case there is any default in payment of mesne profit, the period of One Year for eviction shall stand reduced and the decree of eviction would become executable forthwith. The appellant/defendant/tenant shall also clear all the arrears of rent and mesne profit and pay the same to the respondent/plaintiff within three months from today, otherwise the same will bear interest @9% per annum. The appellant/tenant shall also not sub-let, assign or part with the possession of the suit shop or any part thereof in favour of any one else and would not create any third party interest in the same during the aforesaid period and if it is so done, the same would be treated as void. The appellant-defendant shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the trial court within one month and one copy thereof along with affidavit, in this Court. The appellant-defendant shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the trial court within one month and one copy thereof along with affidavit, in this Court. It is made clear that if the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit premises is not handed over to the respondent-plaintiff within a period of One Year from today or mesne profits are not paid as directed above, besides the expeditious execution of the decree in normal course, the respondent-plaintiff shall also be entitled to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. Appeal dismissed.