Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 2928 (ALL)

Uttam Alias Puttan Dwivedi v. State of U. P. Thru Secy.

2015-09-16

BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA, VIJAY PRAKASH PATHAK

body2015
JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A. G. A. for the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the F. I. R. dated 6.6.2013, which has been registered as Case Crime No. 94 of 2013, under Sections-323 and 504 I. P. C. and Section-3 (1) (x) of SC/ST Act at P. S.-Pailani, district-Banda. 3. From the perusal of the F. I. R., it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein, prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference with the F. I. R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F. I. R. is refused. 4. However, considering the nature of the allegations made in the F. I. R. and submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within thirty days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously, if possible, on the same day by the courts below in view of the settled law laid by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Cr. L. J. 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. With the above directions, this petition is disposed of finally.