JUDGMENT We have heard Sri Pankaj Satsangi, learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the trial court's judgment on record. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Budaun dated 11.06.2015, passed in Sessions Trial No. 762 of 2013, (State of U.P. versus Mullu and others) under sections 307/34 I.P.C, Police Station Ushait, District Budaun acquitting the accused-respondents of the offence punishable under sections referred to above. 3. On a careful perusal of the judgment and record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge is perverse or unreasonable. Simply because another view might have been taken of the evidence provides no ground for interfering with the order of acquittal unless the view taken by the trial judge is not a possible view. On the evidence available on record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge was not a reasonably possible view. 4. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in the appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed.