Judgment 1. Mr.V.Murugan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to grant the approval of the executive committee/office bearers as recorded in Form VII elected and appointed by the Sengunthar Samuthaya Kalvi Committee bearing Registration No.94/2005 to manage the Senguthar High School, Subbulapuram, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District on the basis of the petitioner's proposal dated 22.12.2014 and 01.02.2014 4. It is seen that the petitioners have sought for approval of the Executive Committee/ Office bearers of the educational agency and such request was not considered and returned by the proceedings of the District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District on 27.06.2013 for the reason that a writ petition and civil suit were pending as against the appointment of the Secretary of the petitioner's Society. 5. It is now represented by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that both proceedings were subsequently withdrawn by the person who filed the said proceedings. He has also filed the order withdrawing the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.7163 of 2012 dated 07.11.2014 and O.S.No.264 of 2010 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Sankarankovil dated 03.01.2014 in the typed set. 6. Therefore, it is contended that there cannot be any impediment for the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the request of the petitioner and pass orders on the same. Considering all these facts, I am of the view that the petitioner's Society has to re-submit the proposal bringing to the knowledge of the respondents 2 and 4 that the above writ petition as well as the civil suit were withdrawn by the person who filed the same. It is stated that such representation was already sent to the respondents 2 and 4 on 22.12.2014 and 01.12.2014 respectively and the same has not been considered so far. 7. Considering all these facts and circumstances, I am of the view that the respondents 2 and 4 have to consider the claim of the petitioner seeking for extension/approval of the educational agency and pass orders on the same without any further delay. 8. 7. Considering all these facts and circumstances, I am of the view that the respondents 2 and 4 have to consider the claim of the petitioner seeking for extension/approval of the educational agency and pass orders on the same without any further delay. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the proposals sent by the petitioner dated 22.12.2014 and 01.12.2014 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.