Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 3156 (ALL)

State of U. P. v. Ramsingh

2015-10-07

PRATYUSH KUMAR, VIKRAM NATH

body2015
JUDGMENT We have heard learned A.G.A for the State appellant and perused the trial court's judgment and record. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgement of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Court no.1, Hamirpur dated 03.07.2015 passed in Sessions Trial No. 84 of 2010 (State of U.P. Vs. Ram Singh) under Sections 328, 307 IPC, P.S. Mazgaon, District Hamirpur acquitting the accused-respondent of the offence punishable under sections referred to above. 3. On a careful perusal of the judgement and record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge is perverse or unreasonable. Simply because another view might have been taken of the evidence provides no ground for interfering with the order of acquittal unless the view taken by the trial judge is not a possible view. On the evidence available on record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge was not a reasonably possible view. 4. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in the application for leave to appeal which is rejected and consequently, the Government Appeal is also dismissed.