JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. 2. It has been stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the husband of the deceased is already in jail and the father-in-law of the deceased has been granted bail by the High Court. Petitioner is the mother-in-law and the allegations are general in nature. 3. We do not find any merit in this petition warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. 4. At this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that the bail application of the petitioner in Case Crime No.03 of 2015, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, I.P.C and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Manda, District Allahabad be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. this petition is finally disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner appears and surrenders before the Courts below within two weeks from today and applies for bail, then his bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offences.