JUDGMENT Suneet Kumar, J. The applicant is assailing the order dated 30 April 2015, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Court no.7), Ghaziabad, wherein cost of Rs. 2000/- was imposed upon the applicant who happens to be Station House Officer, P.S. Loni, district Ghaziabad, aggrieved against the order dated 30 April 2015, the applicant filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C being Crl. Misc. Application No. 19697 of 2015 (Raj Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P). The applicant, however, did not press the prayer, on the contrary sought direction that no adverse remark be made on basis of the impugned order in his service record. The Court dismissed the petition under 482 Cr.P.C on 29 July 2015 with an observation that the prayer for adverse remark may be assailed in appropriate proceedings. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that earlier petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C was dismissed for approaching the court hearing service matter but no final adjudication was done regarding the order dated 17 March 2015. 3. Learned A.G.A would submit that the applicant did not press the prayer before the court hearing 482 Cr.P.C petition, therefore, order dated 30 April 2015 attained finality, which cannot be re-agitated in the subsequent petition. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, I am not inclined to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the subsequent petition after dismissal of 482 Cr.P.C. is misuse of process of the Court. There is no fresh cause of action. 5. The petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.