JUDGMENT Bachchoo Lal,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady aged about 50 years. There are three children of the applicant. The applicant has not made any help in committing the alleged offence. The prosecution story is not believable. The FIR of the alleged incident has been lodged delayed i.e. after five months of the alleged incident and there is no satisfactory explanation of this delay. In fact the victim was consenting party with co-accused Suresh. The applicant has no concern with the alleged offence. The applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no criminal history of the applicant and is in jail since 14.8.2015. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail. 5. Let the applicant Smt. Geeta involved in Case Crime No. 239 of 2015, under Sections 120B, 313, 376 IPC and 16/17 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, P.S. Para, District Lucknow be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: - 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidences. 2. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate with the trial. 3. The applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned. 6. In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant. ……………..