Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 3284 (MAD)

Mohamed Abubucker v. State by the Inspector of Police, R. S. Mangalam Police Station

2015-10-08

R.MALA

body2015
ORDER : The petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent and his subordinates not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry based on the complaint of Syed Ibrahim, pending on the file of the respondent. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that after due enquiry, the complaint was closed in CSR.No.255 of 2015. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, since the family dispute between the parties, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioners. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. 5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.