ORDER : The petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition stating that this Court passed an order dated 22.06.2015 wherein a specific direction was issued to the respondents to look into the complaint of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Since the respondents have not disposed of the complaint within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court, the act of the respondents will amount to willful disobedience of the Court order and hence the petitioner is before this Court. 2. Today, the contemnor is present and submits that on receipt of the order from this Court, the records have been perused. The revenue records would show that the land belongs to a temple. He further submits that 'A' Register stated that the particular land was shown as "Temple Poromboke" and the petitioner is not the owner of the property, because in the order itself this Court specifically directed the respondents to look into the complaint of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. After receipt of the contempt notice he has sent a reply dated 11.09.2015 in that it was stated that the action has been taken. In such circumstances, I do not find any elements of contempt and hence the contempt petition is closed.