Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 3311 (MAD)

S. Amalan Sevraj, PMP v. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police

2015-10-09

R.MALA

body2015
Order Heard both sides. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, would submit that the case has been registered in Crime No.274 of 2015 against the petitioners. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. 5. The Criminal Original Petitions are disposed of with the above direction.