Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 3317 (MAD)

Kosamattam Finance Limited v. Superintendent of Police

2015-10-09

R.MALA

body2015
Order The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent to register FIR and initiate necessary action in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint dated 24.07.2015 preferred by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 24.07.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.393 of 2015 is pending. He would further submit that the petitioner did not co-operate with the enquiry. 4. Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry and similarly, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and follow the dictum laid down in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others, 2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC) and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out. 5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.