ORDER : Heard both sides. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in connivance with one Ganesan, considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2015. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, would submit that a case has been registered against the accused in Crime No.671 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. He further submits that there is no harassment at the hands of the respondent police. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, even though he is an accused in Crime No.671 of 2015 the respondent has no right to harass the petitioner. Hence, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. 5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.