Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 3509 (MAD)

S. Mani v. Superintendent of Police

2015-10-28

R.MALA

body2015
ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members and villagers belong to South Kadayam Village. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.371 of 2015. He further submits that the respondent has no harassment against the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, since the case is pending, the respondents are directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioners shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. 5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.