JUDGMENT : Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Undisputedly, as observed by the Revisional Court in the impugned order that during the consolidation survey, total area of Gata No. 2 was found as 10.9680 hectares while as per the record, total area of Gata No. 2 ought to have been 11.7658 hectares. In other words, 0.7968 hectares area was found less on the spot during the consolidation survey. 2. Learned Appellate Authority, vide judgment dated 24.08.2002, was pleased to direct that name of respondent No. 4, Smt. Premwati, herein, should be recorded over the Gata No. 2/7 measuring 1.2655 hectares. Bare perusal of the judgment dated 24.08.2002 would further reveal that there was no change of the area of respondent No. 4, rather, less area was given to other co-sharers. Even then, respondent No. 4 has filed Revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation. Deputy Director of Consolidation without assigning any reason has set aside the order, passed by the Appellate Authority dated 24.08.2002 despite the fact that respondent No. 4 cannot be said to be aggrieved party since there was no change in the area of respondent No. 4. 3. While exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Revisional Court can set aside the judgment passed by the Appellate Court only when there is jurisdictional and legal error. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that Revisional Court has remanded the matter on the ground that Revisional Court thought it proper that re-survey should be done on the spot. Since consolidation survey was never challenged before the Revisional Authority, therefore, remand for re-survey seems to be totally unjustified. 4. Consequently, writ petition is allowed. Impugned judgment is hereby quashed. Judgment and order dated 24.08.2002, passed by the Appellate Authority, is hereby restored.