JUDGMENT Though the petition is ostensibly filed in the public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was inserted in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029. 2. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition since we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner. 3. The petitioner has also disclosed that the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has already initiated steps in the exercise of its statutory powers. A copy of the order passed by SEBI on 24 July 2015 in the matter of Weird Infrastructures Corporation Limited is also annexed to these proceedings. Since the competent statutory authority is already seized of the proceedings, we see no reason to entertain a public interest litigation at this stage. 4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.