JUDGMENT Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Perused the record. 3. It is stated that applicant was arrested in Case Crime No.126 of 2015, under Sections 147, 148, 149 & 307 I.P.C., Police Station Mutthiganj, District Allahabad, on the ground that he had attacked at a police party. In this case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail, vide order of the court concerned dated 8.9.2015. It is stated that while the applicant was in police custody, he has confessed of his involvement in the present criminal Case Crime No.139 of 2015. Submission is that complainant had not stated that he recognized the persons, who are said to have snatched the amount from the complainant, and no test identification parade has been carried out. It is stated that except for the confession of applicant in jail, which cannot be relied upon, there is no other evidence, which has been brought on record to establish his complicity in the present case. It is stated that applicant is being persistently harassed at the instance of the local police. It is stated that applicant has been bailed out in all other cases. It is stated that applicant is lodged in jail since 13th July, 2015, and there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence, the period of detention already undergone, and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant-Rahul Pandey @ Sunil involved in Case Crime No. 139 of 2015, under Sections 394 and 411 I.P.C., Police Station Sankargardh, District Allahabad, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned on the following conditions : - (1) The applicant will not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (2) The applicant will personally appear on each and every date in the court and his personal presence shall not be exempted unless the court itself deems it fit to do so in the interest of justice. 7. It may be observed that in the event of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed for the cancellation of applicant's bail. 8. It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.