JUDGMENT Ramesh Sinha, J. Heard Sri Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Tripathi, learned AGA for the State. 2. By means of the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant has challenged the impugned order dated 29.9.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Firozabad in Misc. Case No. 1292 of 2015 by which the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. of the applicant was treated as a complaint and was directed by the learned Magistrate to be registered as a complaint case and further the learned Magistrate directed the applicant to produce his evidence given under Section 200 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the learned Magistrate has misused his powers under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. and has refused to direct the registration of the FIR against the accused persons and treated the application to be a complaint, though a cognizable offence was disclosed against the applicant which requires the police investigation. 4. Learned AGA on the other hand has submitted that the order passed by the learned Magistrate is inconsonance with the law laid down by the Division of this Court in the case of Sukhwasi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, reported in 2007 (59) SCC 739. Hence, there is no illegality in the said order. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity nor it can be said to be an abuse of the process of Court. Hence, no interference is called for by this Court in the present application moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 6. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application lacks merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed.